*Chaals: One thing that struck me is that I am not sure if we have set up for the idea that a preferred term for a concept, in a particular vocabulary, might be represented by an image or multimedia object rather than a text term... I had thought about using the foaf:depiction property to allow an image representation of a concept. However, reading up on the WWAAC project suggests to me that foaf:depiction may not be enough, and in fact we would need something like skos:prefSymbol and skos:altSymbol (which could be sub-props of foaf:depiction??). Chaals what do you reckon? Al.Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2004 07:50:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:32:04 GMT