OK, for SKOS-Core 1.0: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core# .. And for SKOS-Mapping 1.0: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping# Any objections? Al. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@w3.org] Sent: 19 February 2004 17:16 To: Dave Beckett Cc: Miles, AJ (Alistair) ; 'Nikki Rogers (Nikki.Rogers@bristol.ac.uk)'; 'public-esw-thes@w3.org' Subject: Re: SKOS core namespace * Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> [2004-02-19 17:03+0000] > On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:47:18 -0000, "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " > <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> wrote: > > > So shall we go with this: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos-core# > > > > for SKOS-Core 1.0. > > Do you want multiple namespaces? then maybe > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core# > (contents of http://www.w3c.rl.ac.uk/2003/11/21-skos-core) > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping# > (contents of http://www.w3c.rl.ac.uk/2003/11/21-skos-mapping) Yes, that seems a little better (in practice is means we have this stuff in a subdirectory...) DanReceived on Friday, 20 February 2004 07:03:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:32:04 GMT