> Thanks, this identifies a discomfort I've had w/ interactions between > 'top concept' notion and thesaurus mixing. At heart you're saying > 'top concept' is a relation between a a scheme/dataset/thesaurus and > a concept. Makes sense to me. > > So would this be: > > <owl:FunctionalProperty > rdf:about="http:///....../skos/core#hasTopConcept"/> > > ie. anything that has a skos:hasTopConcept has only one such thing? > Thanks Dan. The original idea was that a scheme has several skos:hasTopConcept properties, pointing to the top level concepts for that scheme (i.e. so not functional). If we made skos:hasTopConcept functional, each scheme would have to be defined with a single root concept ... do you think it's worth doing it that way? Al.Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:27:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:52 GMT