W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > April 2004

Re: URI policy for thesaurus concepts

From: Thomas Bandholtz <thomas@bandholtz.info>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:42:02 +0200
Message-ID: <060201c42ec9$b09cb260$fe78a8c0@Thomast40>
To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Cc: <public-esw@w3.org>

Why not simply follow Xlink/CPointer in this question?

The GET request Alistair has been talking about is a conforming solution.
Example
http://blah?concept=666

Thomas Bandholtz
Semantic Web Consultant
Karl-Friedrich-Schinkelstr. 2
53127 Bonn
Germany
www.bandholtz.info

+49 228  9288490
cell +49 179 4700576
thomas@bandholtz.info


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>; <public-esw@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: URI policy for thesaurus concepts


Alistair: > > Reason for going with / and not # is so that the concept ID is
included in
> > an http GET request and not lost as it would be if it came after a #.

Dan: > I prefer the / approach, but I should warn that TimBL and others have
> made the claim that http://blah/ URIs without a # can only name
> 'documents' or 'networked information resources', and that concepts,
> classes, properties etc don't count as those.
Received on Friday, 30 April 2004 12:03:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:52 GMT