- From: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:14:53 -0400
- To: matt.garrish@gmail.com
- Cc: public-epub3@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:43 AM Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com> wrote: > > My only complaint, if you want to call it that, is that "final community group report" sounds so... unauthoritative. The charter mentioned that IDPF designations would continue to be used for the published documents (Recommended Specification instead of W3C Recommendation, for example). Does the publishing group have special dispensation to continue using those for EPUB 3 releases? Is it still possible that the final versions will use those designations? > > If not, still a +1. I was looking through old community group reports yesterday, and some were called "Final Community Group Specification". But ReSpec doesn't appear to offer us that choice right now, and it seems every recent document is a "Final Community Group Report." I will raise the issue with the W3C Team. Dave
Received on Friday, 28 September 2018 13:15:26 UTC