Re: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments

I have questions about the capitalization and hyphen conventions in C.1
Normative references
<https://w3c.github.io/publ-epub-revision/epub32/spec/epub-contentdocs.html#normative-references>
and
C.2 Informative references
<https://w3c.github.io/publ-epub-revision/epub32/spec/epub-contentdocs.html#informative-references>

Some non-acronyms and initialisms are capitalized like this:* [ContentDocs301]
*and *[CSS-Fonts-3] *and *[W3CProcess]*
Should the following changes occur:
[MATHML3] to [MathML3]
[PRONUNCIATION-LEXICON] to [Pronunciation-Lexicon]
[RDFA-CORE] to [RDFa-Core]
[WEBIDL] to [Web-IDL] (hyphen added as well, see below)
[XML-NAMES] to [XML-Names]

Some spaces are represented by a hyphen like this:* [DOM-Level-2-Style]* and
in a few examples above.
Should the following changes occur:
[CSSSnapshot] to [CSS-Snapshot]
[W3CProcess] to [W3C-Process]
[ContentDocs301] to [Content-Docs-301]
[AttributeExtensions] to [Attribute-Extensions]
[EPUB32Changes] to [EPUB32-Changes]
[EPUB3Overview] to [EPUB3-Overview]
[EPUBAccessibility] to [EPUB-Accessibility]
[WebWorkers] to [Web-Workers]

------------------

If these are correct the way they are, just let me know--there's no need
explaining *why* as I know you all are short on time and I'll figure it out
myself.

Respectfully,
James Briano

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:27 AM John B. Costa <jbcosta@repubit.com> wrote:

> Rachel:  3.2 CHANGES Review
>
> 6.0 – 6.9 Reviewed,  Links checked,  no errors or typos.
> I submitted one recommendation to GitHub for 6.5
> <https://w3c.github.io/publ-epub-revision/epub32/spec/epub-changes.html#structural-semantics>
>   It looks like it was just inserted…. Thanks.
>
> Let me know if there is anything else I can assist with.
>
>
> *John B. Costa  *CEO - RePubIT, LLC | Chair: IEEE ADB Committee
> Sanford FL 32771 USA   +1 321 262-3626
> jbcosta@repubit.com  |  www.linkedin.com/in/johnbcosta1
>
> *Natural Talents Applied Well*
>
>
> From: Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
> Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 5:10 PM
> To: John Costa <jbcosta@repubit.com>
> Cc: W3C EPUB 3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments
>
> Thanks John!
>
> Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility
> | T 212.576.9433
>
> *Macmillan Learning*
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM, John B. Costa <jbcosta@repubit.com> wrote:
>
>> Rachel:
>>
>> EPUB3.2 Changes Tab:
>>
>>    - 5.0-5.3 look good.  No typo’s, grammatical, or language issues.
>>    Links all resolve to the correct docs or location within 3.2.
>>    - I am working on 6.0-6.9 this evening.  Should be finished by
>>    tomorrow morning EDT.
>>
>>
>> *John B. Costa  *CEO - RePubIT, LLC | Chair: IEEE ADB Committee
>> Sanford FL 32771 USA   +1 321 262-3626
>> jbcosta@repubit.com  |  www.linkedin.com/in/johnbcosta1
>>
>> *Natural Talents Applied Well*
>>
>>
>> From: Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
>> Date: Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 12:51 PM
>> To: W3C EPUB 3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
>> Subject: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments
>> Resent-From: <public-epub3@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:52:26 +0000
>>
>> In order to increase the likelihood that our specs have received
>> sufficient review, we are reviving an editorial review practice initiated
>> with 3.1. In this google spreadsheet
>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0WWq758/edit#gid=483122108>
>> is a list of assignees and the sections we would like them to review. We
>> have to keep the sections reasonable. Please review your section by end of
>> day September 7th. If you are unable to review your section, please notify
>> me immediately so I can reassign your sections.
>>
>>
>> To perform your review, please read the listed sections carefully,
>> looking for any issues, such as clarity in language and consistency. You do
>> not have to be a subject matter expert in the area that you are reviewing.
>> If you find any problems, please report them using github, or use the
>> mailing list if that would be more appropriate. Once you have completed
>> your review, whether you have found errors or not, please email me directly
>> so I can note the section has been covered. When reviewing a section, you
>> may stop when a new section not on your list starts.
>>
>> Here again is a link to the assignments. I will also be emailing
>> participants separately to notify them of assignments:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0WWq758/edit#gid=483122108
>>
>> If you do not have an assignment and would like to contribute, please let
>> me know!!
>> Rachel and Dave
>>
>> Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility
>> | T 212.576.9433
>>
>> *Macmillan Learning*
>>
>
>