W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-eo-plan@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: policy plan

From: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:09:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CA++nJxohm38RRLgtKXG95MmwO5vMF9Y9p19cKudaiLrC_XEKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
Cc: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>, Robert Jolly <robert@knowbility.org>, public-eo-plan@w3.org, Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>
Now you see why, Brent, here at knowbility Eric is the CMO Chief Magic
Officer. Well named, yes?

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
wrote:

> Eric,
>
> Thank you. thank you THANK you!!!
> This was excellent to see taken care of. I really appreciate you jumping
> on it for Robert.
>
> So, now we know that:
>
>    - This is the official repository for Policies: https://github.com/
>    w3c/wai-policies-prototype
>    - All issues have been moved from the old repo to this one
>    - Here are the questionable issues for Robert to look through and
>    close or work on: https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues?
>    q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aquestion
>    <https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aquestion>
>    - As far as the name of the repo - I am fine with it not changing if
>    others are as well
>    - Eric will close the other repo when no longer needed for reference
>    (if he hasn't already)
>    - Robert will continue work on Workflow Wiki and Resource based on updated
>    Editing Plan
>    <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-eo-plan/2017JulSep/0025.html>
>
> Thanks everyone.
> Brent
>
>
>
> Brent A. Bakken
> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
> Pearson
>
> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087>
> brent.bakken@pearson.com
>
> Learn more at pearson.com
>
> [image: Pearson]
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> All 15 issues from wai-policieslist are now moved to the wai-policies
>> prototype repository. I’ve marked them with the question label for MaryJo’s
>> or Robert’s attention. (Most seem to be addressed and/or from MaryJo.)
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues?q=is%
>> 3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aquestion
>>
>> Best, Eric
>>
>> PS: This was a welcome change of pace :-D
>> PPS: I will likely make changes to the prototype to port it to the new
>> layout this or early next week.
>>
>> On 14 Sep 2017, at 11:08, Eric Eggert wrote:
>>
>> From the word doc:
>>
>> Regarding the Repository(ies):
>> Currently there are two separate GitHub repositories for Policies. We
>> need to get this down to one repository to eliminate any confusion. We
>> would like you to reach out to Eric and work with him to solve this issue.
>>
>> The current repositories are:
>>
>> * https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues (this is where
>> current submissions go)
>> * https://github.com/w3c/wai-policieslist/issues (but this name makes
>> more sense)
>>
>> Please work on the following tasks to clean this up:
>>
>> 1. Find out from Eric which repository should be kept and which one
>> should be removed/ closed.
>>
>> I think we should keep https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype
>> because it has more and more recent comments, IIRC.
>>
>> We can rename the repository to something more sensible, for example
>> w3c/wai-policies (all links that went to wai-policies-prototype would not
>> resolve anymore, however. There might be a way to set redirects.)
>>
>> (I wonder if the name is a big problem – the perspectives videos repo is
>> wai-showcase-examples, for example.)
>>
>> 2. There are issues in both repositories. Look through all issues in each
>> and close any issues that are complete or no longer relevant to current or
>> future work.
>>
>> 3. Some issues were put off until after the AccessU push. Look through
>> those and determine if any can be completed before relaunch. If they need
>> to wait until after relaunch or 2018 then we need to confirm that list is
>> OK with EOWG, as the expectation is that they would be picked up and worked
>> on in near future.
>>
>> I think the issues need some coordinated actions from Robert and me and
>> maybe MaryJo. *Maybe* I can have a look at what needs to be done and do
>> some/all of it while y’all are doing the user-testing.
>>
>> 4. Work with Eric to transfer issues (open and closed), if possible, to
>> the repository that will be kept. If they cannot be transferred, then you
>> may need to close some in one and open them in the other.
>>
>> I am just using https://github-issue-mover.appspot.com to move all
>> issues from the policieslist to the policies-prototype repository.
>>
>> 5. Once everything is completed, have Eric close the repository that we
>> will not use. BE SURE THE ONE KEPT OPEN IS THE ONE THAT WILL RECEIVE
>> SUBMISSIONS.
>>
>> I can do that :-)
>>
>> BRB
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> On 14 Sep 2017, at 0:26, Bakken, Brent wrote:
>>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Thank you so much for forwarding again. We figured out the issue with the
>> email, so I will see all future "planning" emails.
>>
>> The planning team met this morning to discuss and provide feedback. Sorry
>> for the delay of the response. *Attached is a Word doc* where we had
>> made some edits and added our recommendations to complete your plan. You
>> will find everything that we added or changed highlighted in yellow so you
>> can find it all quickly.
>>
>> With this feedback integrated into your plan, it is approved and you are
>> good to go. Please keep up the great work as you go through the edits and
>> work with your review team to get to a final draft. Remember, if you have
>> any questions at all, please reach out to me right away and I will get you
>> what you need to keep moving forward.
>>
>> Please let us know if you have any questions about what we have added.
>> Happy to provide more detail if needed.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brent (& Planning Team)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Brent A. Bakken
>> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
>> Pearson
>>
>> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087>
>> brent.bakken@pearson.com
>>
>> Learn more at pearson.com
>>
>> [image: Pearson]
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Robert Jolly <robert@knowbility.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Brent,
>>>
>>> I sent it, and asked about the status in my Survey submission this week.
>>> Something weird must be happening!  Here it is again:
>>>
>>> (sent to public-eo-plan@w3.org on 8/24/2017 at 12:25 PM MDT)
>>>
>>> Hello EO Planning Team,
>>>
>>> I have been reviewing the Web Accessibility Laws and Policies resource
>>> for its readiness for the new site design/re-launch, and the resource is in
>>> very good shape, overall. As part of the review process, I have created an initial
>>> Policies Workflow wiki page
>>> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Policies_Workflow> to document how the
>>> resource will be maintained over time. Please review it and let me know
>>> what changes you suggest to clarify or simplify the process and ensure it
>>> is complete and accurate as possible.
>>>
>>> There are a couple of tasks that should be planned for pre-launch, and
>>> they are listed below.
>>>
>>> 1. Review and make edits to the Policies Workflow
>>> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Policies_Workflow> wiki documentation.
>>> 2. Review content within the Policies resource against the WAI Style
>>> Guide <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Style> and make any suggestions
>>> for corrections/updates in GitHub.
>>> This Style Guide review task is not expected to yield substantial
>>> changes, as the resource was recently re-published with the whole group’s
>>> involvement in editing the content.
>>>
>>> Regarding the Workflow wiki page, I have been thinking about whether or
>>> not we should mention it or link to it from the Policies pages where
>>> appropriate (like on the Submission page for changes/additions). I would
>>> like to have feedback from the planning team on whether or not we need to
>>> expose that level of detail directly, though.
>>>
>>> If all of this looks good to you, I will begin that work and distribute
>>> to the Policies reviewers quickly to keep things on track.
>>>
>>> Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions,
>>> suggestions, or needs that I can help with.
>>>
>>> -Robert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>>
>>> Robert Jolly
>>> Sr. Web Accessibility Strategy Consultant
>>> knowbility.org | @knowbility <https://twitter.com/knowbility>
>>> *Equal access to technology for people with disabilities*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 7, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>> Did you by chance send in the policy plan of action to the planning
>>> team? I didn't see the email, or I completely misplaced it. I don't want to
>>> delay your work.
>>>
>>> I know you created the workflow wiki and I have seen that. I just can't
>>> find the plan for simple updates to the resource.
>>>
>>> Let me know if I am missing something.
>>> Brent
>>>
>>>
>>> Brent A. Bakken
>>> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
>>> Pearson
>>>
>>> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087>
>>> brent.bakken@pearson.com
>>>
>>> Learn more at pearson.com
>>>
>>> [image: Pearson]
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Sharron Rush | Executive Director | Knowbility.org | @knowbility
*Equal access to technology for people with disabilities*
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 16:10:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 14 September 2017 16:10:13 UTC