W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-eo-plan@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: policy plan

From: Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:04:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CAE6qf-Gy4h9ETyNh+sc0LN2mpcMMtiuSoBnjq_MKNBLabs75rQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
Cc: Robert Jolly <robert@knowbility.org>, public-eo-plan@w3.org, Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>

Thank you. thank you THANK you!!!
This was excellent to see taken care of. I really appreciate you jumping on
it for Robert.

So, now we know that:

   - This is the official repository for Policies:
   - All issues have been moved from the old repo to this one
   - Here are the questionable issues for Robert to look through and close
   or work on:
   - As far as the name of the repo - I am fine with it not changing if
   others are as well
   - Eric will close the other repo when no longer needed for reference (if
   he hasn't already)
   - Robert will continue work on Workflow Wiki and Resource based on updated
   Editing Plan

Thanks everyone.

Brent A. Bakken
Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services

512 202 1087

Learn more at pearson.com

[image: Pearson]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org> wrote:

> All 15 issues from wai-policieslist are now moved to the wai-policies
> prototype repository. I’ve marked them with the question label for MaryJo’s
> or Robert’s attention. (Most seem to be addressed and/or from MaryJo.)
> https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues?q=
> is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aquestion
> Best, Eric
> PS: This was a welcome change of pace :-D
> PPS: I will likely make changes to the prototype to port it to the new
> layout this or early next week.
> On 14 Sep 2017, at 11:08, Eric Eggert wrote:
> From the word doc:
> Regarding the Repository(ies):
> Currently there are two separate GitHub repositories for Policies. We need
> to get this down to one repository to eliminate any confusion. We would
> like you to reach out to Eric and work with him to solve this issue.
> The current repositories are:
> * https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues (this is where
> current submissions go)
> * https://github.com/w3c/wai-policieslist/issues (but this name makes
> more sense)
> Please work on the following tasks to clean this up:
> 1. Find out from Eric which repository should be kept and which one should
> be removed/ closed.
> I think we should keep https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype
> because it has more and more recent comments, IIRC.
> We can rename the repository to something more sensible, for example
> w3c/wai-policies (all links that went to wai-policies-prototype would not
> resolve anymore, however. There might be a way to set redirects.)
> (I wonder if the name is a big problem – the perspectives videos repo is
> wai-showcase-examples, for example.)
> 2. There are issues in both repositories. Look through all issues in each
> and close any issues that are complete or no longer relevant to current or
> future work.
> 3. Some issues were put off until after the AccessU push. Look through
> those and determine if any can be completed before relaunch. If they need
> to wait until after relaunch or 2018 then we need to confirm that list is
> OK with EOWG, as the expectation is that they would be picked up and worked
> on in near future.
> I think the issues need some coordinated actions from Robert and me and
> maybe MaryJo. *Maybe* I can have a look at what needs to be done and do
> some/all of it while y’all are doing the user-testing.
> 4. Work with Eric to transfer issues (open and closed), if possible, to
> the repository that will be kept. If they cannot be transferred, then you
> may need to close some in one and open them in the other.
> I am just using https://github-issue-mover.appspot.com to move all issues
> from the policieslist to the policies-prototype repository.
> 5. Once everything is completed, have Eric close the repository that we
> I can do that :-)
> Eric
> On 14 Sep 2017, at 0:26, Bakken, Brent wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> Thank you so much for forwarding again. We figured out the issue with the
> email, so I will see all future "planning" emails.
> The planning team met this morning to discuss and provide feedback. Sorry
> for the delay of the response. *Attached is a Word doc* where we had made
> some edits and added our recommendations to complete your plan. You will
> find everything that we added or changed highlighted in yellow so you can
> find it all quickly.
> With this feedback integrated into your plan, it is approved and you are
> good to go. Please keep up the great work as you go through the edits and
> work with your review team to get to a final draft. Remember, if you have
> any questions at all, please reach out to me right away and I will get you
> what you need to keep moving forward.
> Please let us know if you have any questions about what we have added.
> Happy to provide more detail if needed.
> Thanks,
> Brent (& Planning Team)
> Brent A. Bakken
> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
> Pearson
> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087>
> brent.bakken@pearson.com
> Learn more at pearson.com
> [image: Pearson]
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Robert Jolly <robert@knowbility.org>
> wrote:
>> Hi Brent,
>> I sent it, and asked about the status in my Survey submission this week.
>> Something weird must be happening!  Here it is again:
>> (sent to public-eo-plan@w3.org on 8/24/2017 at 12:25 PM MDT)
>> Hello EO Planning Team,
>> I have been reviewing the Web Accessibility Laws and Policies resource
>> for its readiness for the new site design/re-launch, and the resource is in
>> very good shape, overall. As part of the review process, I have created an initial
>> Policies Workflow wiki page
>> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Policies_Workflow> to document how the
>> resource will be maintained over time. Please review it and let me know
>> what changes you suggest to clarify or simplify the process and ensure it
>> is complete and accurate as possible.
>> There are a couple of tasks that should be planned for pre-launch, and
>> they are listed below.
>> 1. Review and make edits to the Policies Workflow
>> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Policies_Workflow> wiki documentation.
>> 2. Review content within the Policies resource against the WAI Style
>> Guide <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Style> and make any suggestions
>> for corrections/updates in GitHub.
>> This Style Guide review task is not expected to yield substantial
>> changes, as the resource was recently re-published with the whole group’s
>> involvement in editing the content.
>> Regarding the Workflow wiki page, I have been thinking about whether or
>> not we should mention it or link to it from the Policies pages where
>> appropriate (like on the Submission page for changes/additions). I would
>> like to have feedback from the planning team on whether or not we need to
>> expose that level of detail directly, though.
>> If all of this looks good to you, I will begin that work and distribute
>> to the Policies reviewers quickly to keep things on track.
>> Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions, suggestions,
>> or needs that I can help with.
>> -Robert
>> -----
>> Robert Jolly
>> Sr. Web Accessibility Strategy Consultant
>> knowbility.org | @knowbility <https://twitter.com/knowbility>
>> *Equal access to technology for people with disabilities*
>> On Sep 7, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
>> wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>> Did you by chance send in the policy plan of action to the planning team?
>> I didn't see the email, or I completely misplaced it. I don't want to delay
>> your work.
>> I know you created the workflow wiki and I have seen that. I just can't
>> find the plan for simple updates to the resource.
>> Let me know if I am missing something.
>> Brent
>> Brent A. Bakken
>> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
>> Pearson
>> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087>
>> brent.bakken@pearson.com
>> Learn more at pearson.com
>> [image: Pearson]
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 16:05:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 14 September 2017 16:05:08 UTC