W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-eo-plan@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: Which document to attack next?

From: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:03:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CA++nJxq-CNSjN4bQYg0EEmmXPeQQ9qcBsgas+fhSRk71u6c+AQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, Nic Steenhout <nic@knowbility.org>, Brent Bakken <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
Cc: public-eo-plan@w3.org
Thanks for the suggestion, but I am OK doing the Business Case. Kind of
enjoying it actually.  Nic is welcome to continue to review and give
feedback, much appreciated!

On Sep 13, 2017 7:18 PM, "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org> wrote:

> On 9/13/2017 4:52 PM, Sharron Rush wrote:
>
> May I suggest that Nic help with the business case? That seems a much
> higher priority than the docs below...
>
> Actually we decided that all of these documents - while having been
>> checked for accuracy, current browser and technology references, and
>> broken links - they all need tersification review.  Nearly all of them are
>> too long and wordy.
>>
>> So Nic, I will prioritize these for your review as follows:
>>
>>   * The work on choosing tools with Laura - top priority
>>
>> After that, please ask Eric to put content in new skin and
>> review for brevity, clarity, plain language, and active voice in this
>> order:
>>
>>   * First Aid : Interim Repairs <https://www.w3.org/WAI/impl/Overview>
>>   * Planning and Managing Guide <https://www.w3.org/WAI/impl/Overview>
>> (including sub pages)
>>   * Involving Users  (web projects) <https://www.w3.org/WAI/users/
>> involving>
>>   * Involving Users (evaluation) <https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/users>
>>   * Developing Organizational policies <https://www.w3.org/WAI/impl/pol>this
>> one has a note to "address submitted comments" but I have no idea where
>> those comments might be.
>>
>>
> What about Contacting Orgs <https://www.w3.org/WAI/users/inaccessible.html>
> ?
>
> You can start by looking at Vicki's notes in the spreadsheet and let us
>> know if you have any questions.
>>
>
> No need to wait for me on the comments from Vicki. Anyone can address
> those.
>
> The only one to wait on is Accessibility, Usability, Inclusion.
>
> ~Shawn
>
>
>> Best,
>> Sharron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com
>> <mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Oh, Okay.
>>
>>     Then until we check with Shawn for other updates she has completed,
>> the next ones are lower priority (only do when Nic has no other to attend
>> to), they are the tutorials (lines 14-19).
>>     What do you think Sharron? Do those next when nothing else is ready?
>>
>>     I will respond to Laura and Nic's "Selecting Eval Tools" right now so
>> that will be ready too.
>>
>>
>>     *__*
>>
>>     Brent A. Bakken
>>     Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
>>     Pearson
>>
>>     512 202 1087 <tel:(512)%20202-1087>
>>     brent.bakken@pearson.com <mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com>
>>
>>     Learn more at pearson.com <http://pearson.com>
>>     Pearson
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org
>> <mailto:srush@knowbility.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         He already completed edits on Contacting Orgs...needs review
>>
>>         On Sep 13, 2017 3:17 PM, "Bakken, Brent" <
>> brent.bakken@pearson.com <mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Nic,
>>
>>             Thanks for the email. Looking at the spreadsheet it looks
>> like a lot of them need Shawn to do some minor update first and then it is
>> on to you. I can follow up with Shawn about where she is on her step and
>> get the spreadsheet updated. I guess the next one you could tackle is the
>> top on on row 2 (Contacting Orgs about inaccessible Sites). Column G
>> indicates that one is ready for you.
>>
>>             Also, just a heads up. We met this morning about the resource
>> you and Laura are working on, "Selecting Eval Tools". I have some feedback
>> for the plan that you two put together. I will be emailing that out to you
>> and Laura in a moment. Once you have that, the two of you can start working
>> on the edits to that resource as well. That will be highest priority for
>> you.
>>
>>             I hope this helps you out.
>>             Talk to you soon,
>>             Brent
>>
>>             *__*
>>
>>             Brent A. Bakken
>>             Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
>>             Pearson
>>
>>             512 202 1087 <tel:(512)%20202-1087>
>>             brent.bakken@pearson.com <mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com>
>>
>>             Learn more at pearson.com <http://pearson.com>
>>             Pearson
>>
>>
>>
>>             On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Nic Steenhout <
>> nic@knowbility.org <mailto:nic@knowbility.org>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Hello Sharron, Brent,
>>
>>                 I was starting work on "Accessibility, Usability, and
>> Inclusion", and was asking Eric Eggert about write access to the document
>> in GitHub. After a bit of discussion and him checking in with Shawn, it
>> appears that this document needs other edits before being touched.
>>
>>                 This leads me to wonder if perhaps I could get a list of
>> which documents I should approach first?
>>
>>                 Does something like that already exist? The EOWG Resource
>> Management spreadsheet in google docs I see doesn't have that indication
>> (that I can see).
>>
>>                 Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>                 Thank you
>>
>>                 Nic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sharron Rush | Executive Director | Knowbility.org | @knowbility
>> /Equal access to technology for people with disabilities/
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 01:03:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 14 September 2017 01:03:55 UTC