W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-eo-plan@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: Tutorials was: Re: Which document to attack next?

From: Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:58:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAE6qf-HzoitJsYerdyopqPBWX7Nhp98ouNmrkonjbwuN1JCVQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
Cc: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>, public-eo-plan@w3.org
Sharron steered Nic away from that. She gave him a different list to work
on.
Leaving all Tutorials as extremely low priority (the ones you tersified,
not at all)



Brent A. Bakken
Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
Pearson

512 202 1087
brent.bakken@pearson.com

Learn more at pearson.com

[image: Pearson]


On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org> wrote:

> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 13. Sep 2017, at 23:52, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org> wrote:
> >
> > Then until we check with Shawn for other updates she has completed, the
> next ones are lower priority (only do when Nic has no other to attend to),
> they are the tutorials (lines 14-19)
>
> Uhm, are we also re-doing the Tutorials? At least the three that launched
> recently have been tersified by me. (Remember the process of getting
> consensus for the changes? :-))
>
> The others can take some massaging, but I wonder if it would be
> better/easier if I did it? (There are also several changes pending.)
>
> Just curious.
>
> Eric
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 22:58:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 13 September 2017 22:58:40 UTC