- From: Nic Steenhout <nic@knowbility.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:55:08 -0400
- To: "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
- Cc: "Keen, Laura" <lkee@loc.gov>, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>, "Green, James" <jgreen@visa.com>, "Shadi Abou-Zahra (shadi@w3.org)" <shadi@w3.org>, Robert Jolly <robert@knowbility.org>, "public-eo-archive@w3.org" <public-eo-archive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMBJsFCOhqiJMRS9ytU9-0N0+pnhPu=91QBRr+8K1FypPdDUsg@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you Brent, Laura and I had just agreed earlier on this afternoon to wait until other people have commented before doing any changes :) Cheers Nic On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com> wrote: > Hi Laura and Nic, > > Completed my review. I like what you have done with the resource. I have > added 4 issues for your consideration. I am sure the others will add more > so I wouldn't jump on mine right away. See what others add to mine or add > on their own. > > Thanks for working so hard on this, > Brent > > > > Brent A. Bakken > Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services > Pearson > > 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087> > brent.bakken@pearson.com > > Learn more at pearson.com > > [image: Pearson] > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Keen, Laura <lkee@loc.gov> wrote: > >> Thanks Brent. >> >> >> >> 1. Please report issues in GitHub https://github.com/w3c/wai-sel >> ecting-eval-tools/issues >> >> 2. comments by COB Thursday September 21 if possible, if not >> please let us know. >> >> >> >> Thanks for the review. >> >> >> >> Laura >> >> >> >> *From:* Bakken, Brent [mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com] >> *Sent:* Friday, September 15, 2017 1:13 PM >> *To:* Nic Steenhout; Keen, Laura >> *Cc:* Sharron Rush; Green, James; Shadi Abou-Zahra (shadi@w3.org); >> Robert Jolly; public-eo-archive@w3.org >> *Subject:* Re: Updates to Selecting Evaluation Tools >> >> >> >> Hi Nic and Laura, >> >> >> >> Thanks for pulling this review request together. Just a couple of things. >> >> >> >> 1. I am assuming that you would like this small review team to put >> any feedback, recommendations, or suggested edits into this same GitHub >> repository as Issues titled appropriately. Please confirm. >> 2. Also, Can you please provide the small review team with a deadline >> to be sure to have the review completed by (hope that mid to end of next >> week would be enough time for everyone). Please specify a date and time >> that you would like this complete so that everyone can account for it in >> their own schedules. >> >> Looking forward to reviewing! Thanks, >> >> Brent >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *Brent A. Bakken* >> >> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services >> Pearson >> >> >> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087> >> brent.bakken@pearson.com >> >> *Learn more at pearson.com <http://pearson.com>* >> >> >> >> [image: Pearson] >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Nic Steenhout <nic@knowbility.org> >> wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> >> >> Laura and I have worked on the Selecting Evaluation Tools document. We >> would appreciate your review and feedback. >> >> >> >> The page lives on GitHub and used MultiMarkDown so it should be easy to >> read and follow without needing a preview. >> >> >> >> https://github.com/w3c/wai-selecting-eval-tools/blob/master/index.md >> >> >> >> The work involved tersifying and simplifying the language. This led to >> significant changes to the document. Both Laura and I feel that all the >> necessary information is there, and easy to find, read and understand. >> Feedback from the planning committee was taken into account. >> >> >> >> We had discussed the possibility of creating a second page with more >> in-depth information. On further consideration, neither Laura nor I believe >> this to be necessary. >> >> >> >> Thanks all. >> >> >> >> Nic >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2017 22:55:33 UTC