Re: Updates to Selecting Evaluation Tools

Thank you Brent,

1) You are correct, feedback should be lodged in the GitHub repository as
Issues.
2) If feedback can be given by September 22, end of next week, that would
be most excellent.

Thanks again.

Nic

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
wrote:

> Hi Nic and Laura,
>
> Thanks for pulling this review request together. Just a couple of things.
>
>
>    1. I am assuming that you would like this small review team to put any
>    feedback, recommendations, or suggested edits into this same GitHub
>    repository as Issues titled appropriately. Please confirm.
>    2. Also, Can you please provide the small review team with a deadline
>    to be sure to have the review completed by (hope that mid to end of next
>    week would be enough time for everyone). Please specify a date and time
>    that you would like this complete so that everyone can account for it in
>    their own schedules.
>
> Looking forward to reviewing! Thanks,
> Brent
>
>
>
> Brent A. Bakken
> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
> Pearson
>
> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087>
> brent.bakken@pearson.com
>
> Learn more at pearson.com
>
> [image: Pearson]
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Nic Steenhout <nic@knowbility.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Laura and I have worked on the Selecting Evaluation Tools document. We
>> would appreciate your review and feedback.
>>
>> The page lives on GitHub and used MultiMarkDown so it should be easy to
>> read and follow without needing a preview.
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wai-selecting-eval-tools/blob/master/index.md
>>
>> The work involved tersifying and simplifying the language. This led to
>> significant changes to the document. Both Laura and I feel that all the
>> necessary information is there, and easy to find, read and understand.
>> Feedback from the planning committee was taken into account.
>>
>> We had discussed the possibility of creating a second page with more
>> in-depth information. On further consideration, neither Laura nor I believe
>> this to be necessary.
>>
>> Thanks all.
>>
>> Nic
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 15 September 2017 17:34:24 UTC