- From: Holm, Jeanne M (1760) <jeanne.m.holm@jpl.nasa.gov>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:47:49 +0000
- To: Serafín Olcoz <olcoz@ej-gv.es>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, "eGov IG (Public)" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Serafin-- My apologies for overlooking the earlier suggestion for your talk. I'd be happy to put you on the agenda. I'll sort out the details with you offline. --Jeanne ********************************************************** Jeanne Holm Evangelist, Data.gov U.S. General Services Administration Cell: (818) 434-5037 Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn: JeanneHolm ********************************************************** On 11/19/12 1:40 AM, "Serafín Olcoz" <olcoz@ej-gv.es> wrote: >Dear Phil, > >I submitted a proposal about a Decree of Basque Government related to Open >Data and Open Government and I did not receive any feedback from anybody. >Could you please tell me how to proceed in order that Basque Government >proposal, as W3C member, should be taken into account and discussed in >this >WG? Maybe including it in the Agenda of a next meeing or so... > >Best regards, > >Serafin Olcoz > > >El 16/11/12 18:41, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org> escribió: > >> Minutes of today's eGov IG meeting are at >> >> http://www.w3.org/2012/11/16-egov-minutes.html >> >> And copied below as text for those that prefer it that way (like me :-)) >> >> eGov IG 16 November 2012 >> >> 16 Nov 2012 >> >> See also: [2]IRC log >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/11/16-egov-irc >> >> Attendees >> >> Present >> +1.508.333.aaaa, +1.303.869.aabb, bhyland, PhilA2, >> GannonDick, +1.703.281.aacc, GwynSutherlin, thschee, >> bgryth, brand, +3539149aaee, DeirdreLee, Jeanne_Holm, >> +1.202.651.aaff >> >> Chair >> Jeanne Holm >> >> Scribe >> PhilA2, Jeanne, Bernadette >> >> Contents >> >> * [3]Topics >> 1. [4]Summary of ISWC2012, ISWC, ISWC12 >> 2. [5]Plans for topic or Open data >> 3. [6]Bernadette Hyland on TPAC 2012 >> 4. [7]Brian Gryth on Open Data >> 5. [8]Daniel Bennett Plans for Summarizing eGov >> Discussions >> 6. [9]WWW2013 Brazil >> __________________________________________________________ >> >> <bhyland> good morning all >> >> <GwynSutherlin> I think I'm an IP caller too >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Um, me too. >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Good day all. >> >> <bgryth> Good day all >> >> <bhyland> Agenda >> >> <bhyland> • 0800-0810: Open Data Kickoff (Jeanne Holm) >> >> <bhyland> • 0810-0830: 2012 TPAC Overview (Bernadette Hyland) >> >> <bhyland> ◦ TPAC 2012: >> [10]http://3roundstones.com/2012/11/08/tpac-2012-liberte-and-th >> e-open-web-platform/ >> >> [10] >> >http://3roundstones.com/2012/11/08/tpac-2012-liberte-and-the-open-web-plat >form> >/ >> >> <bhyland> ◦ TPAC 2012: >> [11]http://3roundstones.com/2012/11/08/tpac-2012-4-days-of-open >> -web-standards-nouvelle-cuisine/ >> >> [11] >> >>http://3roundstones.com/2012/11/08/tpac-2012-4-days-of-open-web-standards >>-nouv >> elle-cuisine/ >> >> <bhyland> • 0830-0855: OpenColorado (Brian Gryth) >> >> <bhyland> • 0855-0920: Plans for Summarizing eGov Discussions >> (Daniel Bennett) >> >> <bhyland> • 0920-0930: Call for session on open data at >> [12]http://www2013.org/ (Jeanne Holm) >> >> [12] http://www2013.org/ >> >> ISWC info at [13]http://iswc2012.semanticweb.org/ >> >> [13] http://iswc2012.semanticweb.org/ >> >> <GannonDick> I have no idea what I'm doing >> >> Summary of ISWC2012, ISWC, ISWC12 >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> The keynote I gave is online already at >> [14]http://www.slideshare.net/jeanneholm1/iswc-2012-keynote >> >> [14] http://www.slideshare.net/jeanneholm1/iswc-2012-keynote >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Gannon...follow what I do... >> >> <GannonDick> got it >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: ISWC2012 was very good, every other >> poster session referenced linked data, which was a change >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Previously was OWL, inferencing, and was >> more about big data and scaling >> >> <GannonDick> bhyland: half from Europe >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Largely European, next Asia, next >> US--but clearly global impact. Perhaps 700+ at the conference >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> :-) >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Big projects, large scale, commercial >> projects as well >> >> <bgryth> yeah iTirage >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> iTriage was started by two doctors from Colorado >> >> Jeanne_Holm: Thanks everyone who has been participating in the >> last 3 months or so >> ... Trying to get people from different and diverse countries >> ... we've concluded proceedings on social media for now. Daniel >> is going to talk about how we're going to craft an actual W3C >> Note from that >> >> Plans for topic or Open data >> >> Jeanne_Holm: Talks coming up on aggregating and using open data >> ... starting with broad scale over views and we'll then get >> into more specifics >> ... we can extend the series as long as the group wants us to >> >> Bernadette Hyland on TPAC 2012 >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> I got it Phil... >> >> <bhyland> TPAC 2012: >> [15]http://3roundstones.com/2012/11/08/tpac-2012-liberte-and-th >> e-open-web-platform/ >> >> [15] >> >http://3roundstones.com/2012/11/08/tpac-2012-liberte-and-the-open-web-plat >form> >/ >> >> <bhyland> ◦ TPAC 2012: >> [16]http://3roundstones.com/2012/11/08/tpac-2012-4-days-of-open >> -web-standards-nouvelle-cuisine/ >> >> [16] >> >>http://3roundstones.com/2012/11/08/tpac-2012-4-days-of-open-web-standards >>-nouv >> elle-cuisine/ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: At TPAC 2012 this year eGov and Gov >> Linked Data groups did not have a formal event, although they >> did last year >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: The technical plenary and advisory >> committee (TPAC) is where the 380 member organizations have a >> chance to impact the priorities of the W3C >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: W3C staff can also share what is going >> on with the overall organization. Each member company (like IBM >> or Oracle) gets one representative. >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: W3C put on an amazing event and the >> blogs posted above contain my notes >> >> Pretty much any and all praise for the organisation of TPAC is >> due to the rather wonderful Alex >> [17]http://www.w3.org/People/all#alex >> >> [17] http://www.w3.org/People/all#alex >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Jeff''s key point was that the W3C is in >> early phase of adoption and was grounded that there is a lot to >> be done >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Big project with focus is HTML5 but >> won't be published formally as a standard until 2014 >> >> Web Platform [18]http://www.webplatform.org/ >> >> [18] http://www.webplatform.org/ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Web developers of all kinds should have >> a place on the web where they can get access to documentation >> (Doug Shepherd?) which is the clearing house >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> correction: Web Platform as noted >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: There is a Department of Education grant >> to the W3C for the person to help lead the accessibility >> group--very cool and impressive with the number of people who >> are producing the platform at all levels of abilities >> >> Worth noting that our Web Content Accessibility Guidelines are >> cited in the legislation of several countries (as well as more >> in gov guidelines) >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Extraordinary experience, who's who of >> thought leaders, not academic like ISWC. You should definitely >> participate and plan to attend when able. Well honed W3C >> infrastructure. >> >> Community Groups and Business Groups have replaced Incubator >> Groups as the quick start, lightweight process for >> bringing/airing work at W3C >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Community groups are new to W3C--if >> someone has an idea for something (like Henry Story on WebID) >> and gets 5 people to agree, then they can propose a community. >> >> <Daniel_Bennett> Jenni Tennison did a great key note about >> linking RDF, JSON as well as HTML and XML >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: JSON developers proposed a spec for >> working with linked data as an example (had been initiated by a >> community group) >> >> -> JSON-LD Community Group >> [19]http://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/ >> >> [19] http://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/ >> >> ->emerging JSON-LD syntax spec >> [20]http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-syntax/ >> >> [20] http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-syntax/ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Great way for companies to be able to >> contribute to the open web platform >> >> <Daniel_Bennett> video by Jenni Tennison about linking RDF, >> JSON, HTML, and XML >> [21]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K_CAiVyqTQ >> >> [21] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K_CAiVyqTQ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Big emphasis was on HTML5, mobile >> support and devices, and the Open Web Platform >> >> <GannonDick> jalapenos for pizza available ? >> >> Ooh, thanks Daniel_Bennett I've not seen that >> >> <bhyland> #1 theme from Gov't breakout was: >> >> <bhyland> Everyone wants ROI stories for publication & >> consumption of Linked Data. >> >> <bhyland> #2 - Common problem is overwhelming government >> officials with tech speak. Consider having a template from >> which internal champions can pull language: >> >> <bhyland> • Financial benefits >> >> <bhyland> • Social responsibility benefits >> >> <bhyland> • Legal & regulatory benefits >> >> <bhyland> • Technical benefits >> >> <bhyland> #3 theme - Need to document on W3C site compelling >> applications using Linked Data are critical, beef up SWEO >> concept & bring it up to date for LD deployments in the wild. >> This will help Gartner too. >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> >> [22]http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/images/d/d6/Gryth_OpenData_eGov >> .ppt >> >> [22] >>http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/images/d/d6/Gryth_OpenData_eGov.ppt >> >> Jeanne_Holm: Thanks Bernadette. We're seeing real traction on >> data across the board - good stuff! >> >> Brian Gryth on Open Data >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: The vision of Open Colorado is that we >> are looking to support transformation that is happening in >> goverment that will be more beautiful, simply and easy to use >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: We are created to help make that happen >> >> slide 3 >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Education, tools, and partnerships are >> the focus >> >> Slide 4 >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Education = W3C, Code for America, OKF >> involvement, plus CGATE, which is open government at local >> levels >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: DenverCog--regional group that works with >> governments to free up the data >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: OpenColorado helps to host data as well >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Colorado Municipal League--city managers and >> attorneys, presentations on what open government is and >> touching on open data and policies that are needed >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Social media trainings, and >> CityCamps--last one in October and a combo >> conference/unconference >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> [23]http://opencolorado.org/citycamp-colorado/ >> >> [23] http://opencolorado.org/citycamp-colorado/ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: The tool component is at >> [24]http://data.opencolorado.org >> >> [24] http://data.opencolorado.org/ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: We look at how to make data findable and >> get it out. We have Denver, Arvada, Boulder, Castlerock, and >> counties of Denver and Boulder. A CKAN instance from OKF. >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Went with CKAN based on Data.gov.uk model >> of using open source platform and tools (US Data.gov was custom >> built at that time) >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> (Personal note: Data.gov released open source >> code on Github now too ;-) >> [25]https://github.com/opengovplatform >> >> [25] https://github.com/opengovplatform >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: First city camp had a lot of CEOs and >> CIOs saying that data was open, but didn't know how to go to >> the next step with policies >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: We sat down and wrote a policy based on >> President Obama's open government directive and created a model >> policy that looked at the ways to create a policy >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Cook County adopted as well as others >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Technology + policy component >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: We are a small group and this is not our >> main jobs, so we need help to build capacity and we partner >> with governments >> >> we're now on slide 6 >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: A lot of gov attorneys do not know about >> IP, but there is a shift now and we are helping them understand >> about open record requests, digital material, and trademarks >> and open data and open gov >> >> <bhyland> @bgryth, do you want to take questions interleaved or >> at end? >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: At same time as this CityCamp, there was >> Denver StartUp week and we ran events on civic innovation >> [26]http://denverstartupweek.com/ >> >> [26] http://denverstartupweek.com/ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Had an apps challenge and got two >> winners: Open Bike (bike lockers, thefts, paths) lets people >> create and rate bike routes (overview at >> [27]http://opencolorado.org/citycamp-colorado-2012-presenters/) >> >> [27] http://opencolorado.org/citycamp-colorado-2012-presenters/) >> >> <GwynSutherlin> Indy needs an app like that. they are bike/car >> planning challenged >> >> Apps around bicyle usage is interesting. How do you comment on >> a point of interest along the route? i.e. how do you represent >> a POI I wonder >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Second winner: Displaying and visualizing >> the data around crime >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Next focus is on rural communities that >> may not have digital literacy or technologies, they give a lot >> back to the big cities, so how to help each other >> >> <GwynSutherlin> internet access in rural US is worse than in >> middle of amazon >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: We are creating an Adopt a City program >> (slide 7) that over 4 years helps rural cities get up and >> running through training and mentorship >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Code for Communities: >> odeforcommunities.org >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Code for communities: >> [28]http://codeforcommunities.org >> >> [28] http://codeforcommunities.org/ >> >> <bgryth> denver-wiki.org >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> [29]http://denver-wiki.org >> >> [29] http://denver-wiki.org/ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Storify on CityCamp: >> [30]http://storify.com/michelehovet/citycampco-2012. >> >> [30] http://storify.com/michelehovet/citycampco-2012. >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Host to Host a City Camp: >> [31]http://www.govtech.com/govgirl/How-to-Host-a-CityCamp.html >> >> [31] http://www.govtech.com/govgirl/How-to-Host-a-CityCamp.html >> >> <bhyland> whew! Does bgryth breath?? >> >> <GannonDick> don't think so >> >> bhyland: Are you one of the oldest city open gov data efforts? >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> (Gannon--are you up for scribing the next talk?) >> >> bgryth: We're first to adopt CKAN in the USA >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: We started using CKAN in 2010 >> >> bgryth: we're one of the older ones >> >> <GannonDick> trying jeanne can't type fst enough >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bhyland: Questions: would it make sense to get a >> funded model? Have you surveyed or gotten seed funding? >> >> bhyland: Huge achievements so far, but hwo about getting >> funding so it moves out of the willing volunteer sphere >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: We have some funding to support website >> >> bgryth: We have some funding for the hosting (on Amazon) >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Thanks! >> >> bgryth: We're going to have to look at different models. WE >> have a lot of partners. Denver almost doubled our catalogue. >> DRCOG is the largest and we're getting that by scraping their >> site >> ... need to look at improving that >> ... right now it's free for the gov. We'd like to change that >> ... need a more sustainable model >> ... got ideas on working with other portals. Want to integrate >> across not just catalogues bu catalogue platforms >> ... the 6 of us that do this are running at capacity. We need >> help >> >> bhyland: The other comment I'd make... I work on getting >> federal data published. Screen scraped data is likely to back >> fire as it is brittle >> ... no thought about licences, URI persistence etc. >> ... feels like a bunch of enthusiastic university folk. Needs >> broader/state/federal level support >> ... I want to help make it more sustainable >> >> bgryth: I agree... we want to make sure that we do what you're >> saying >> ... needs to become sustainable >> ... I don't want it to become like a box ticking exercise with >> no commitment >> ... they need to put resources behind it >> >> <bhyland> It is *really* important that our open government >> data efforts are implemented in a sustainable manner, with >> OSI-approved Open Licenses are associated with data sets, and >> other key metadata about publication frequency, disclaimers, >> etc >> >> <bhyland> … and well considered Web architecture >> >> <bhyland> … and done in a scalable manner that avoid data >> duplication >> >> bgryth: For the hackathon, we didn't give prize money, we got a >> management firm to give them their kind of help to help them be >> more sustainable >> >> [32]http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/openstandards >> >> [32] http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/openstandards >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> PhilA2: Interesting to see the different >> perspective where there is investment in the UK and here in >> Colorado it's a volunteer effort for OpenColorado >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> PhilA2: Are there standards you wish existed if >> people would use them? >> >> <bhyland> RE: W3C Government Linked Data Standards … >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: There are a lot of organizations looking >> at the problems around this >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> bgryth: Trying to form a CKAN association and >> then work with the W3C >> >> <bhyland> @ggryth - I'd invite you to consider discussing / >> contributing some of the lessons learned about managing >> datasets to help it become codified in a W3C published Best >> Practices doc ... >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> (Daniel--are you set?) >> >> <bhyland> bgryth: License >> >> <bhyland> Select the license under which the data is >> released.OpenColorado recommends either of the following >> licenses:[33]http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/h >> ttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ >> >> [33] >> >>http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/http://creativecommons.o >>rg/li >> censes/by/3.0/ >> >> Daniel Bennett Plans for Summarizing eGov Discussions >> >> <bgryth> Thanks everyone! >> >> See wiki [34]http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Plans >> >> [34] http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Plans >> >> <Daniel_Bennett> [35]http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Plans >> >> [35] http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Plans >> >> <bhyland> @pgryth, thank you for a very comprehensive dive on >> Open Colorado, great work! Very interesting, thank you. >> >> Daniel_Bennett: The idea is that for each of these, we'll have >> a meeting to get us towards a concrete/finsihed product. These >> will be separate from the monthly eGov IG meetings >> ... Series of Meetings >> >> Whiteboard/Ideas session >> >> Requirements >> >> Outline >> >> Delegation >> >> First Draft Deadline >> >> Executive Summary/One pager >> >> Editorial Session for content >> >> Editorial Session for accessibility, proofing, readability >> >> W3C vetting >> >> Daniel_Bennett: Delegation - volunteers often dry up so here's >> where we get people to commit to deliver a section >> ... that will tell us how real this is >> >> q >> >> <bhyland> Who is the target audience for this writeup? >> >> We can be quick when we have to be, honestly... >> >> <bhyland> @Daniel_Bennett … can you provide the 50,000' view of >> what you're aiming to achieve with this writeup please? >> >> Daniel_Bennett: We may use the wiki or we may have a secretary >> (prob me) who will collect text in whatever format and add it >> to the wiki >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Target audience is for the larger community of >> eGov people who are not actually on the calls themselves. >> >> Daniel_Bennett: I think having a checklist for gov workers is >> important >> ... it can be something generic enough for everyone to use and >> can be tailored to specific circumstances >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Daniel_Bennett: Have a menu for social media to >> broaden the possibilities >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> >> [36]http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Checklist_for_Social_Media >> >> [36] http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Checklist_for_Social_Media >> >> <bhyland> @Jeanne_Holm, so is it a summary of all the eGov >> meetings or a work product like a best practices doc? >> >> Daniel_Bennett: The idea is that there is a process - rules >> etc. on how they do things. So first thing would be to draw a >> diagram of how they do things in that department >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Bhyland--a work product that will highlight some >> best practices (not to be an exhaustive research project) and >> the important things for gov implementers and those in the >> field to be aware of based on research and implementations >> presented from our group. >> >> <bhyland> @jeanne_holm, thanks, understand. >> >> Daniel_Bennett: Then any legal issues. The federal gov has a >> specific contract. Others might have similar things to deal >> with. Accessibility, privacy etc. >> ... May be rules on moderation >> ... May be rules on publishing government communications, >> activities etc. >> ... In the whiteboard session I can look at the different >> layers so folks can see who they'll need to talk to >> ... Moves on to the menu >> [37]http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Menu_for_Social_Media >> >> [37] http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Menu_for_Social_Media >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> q >> >> Daniel_Bennett: Hoping to have a meeting every 2 weeks to make >> progress. Hope people are interested to lend a hand >> >> Jeanne_Holm: I just want to mention a couple of things. You've >> done some of these before - I like the framework >> ... You didn't volunteer to do everything. >> >> Daniel_Bennett: I volunteered to do the social media one >> >> Jeanne_Holm: We're looking for volunteers for this but also to >> do the same thing for the open data series as well >> >> Daniel_Bennett: Any questions or, better still, offers of help? >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Please make sure to include me on the meeting for >> social media write up! >> >> Daniel_Bennett: I'll take help from outsdie the Interest Group! >> >> bhyland: I would encourage at least quarterly attendance for >> some folk here in the GLD Working Group >> [38]http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ >> >> [38] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> These are great meetings and I enoucrage people >> to attend as well. I attend as able. >> >> bhyland: The vocab discussions may not be the ones of greatest >> interest but the best practice meetings would be - procurement, >> publishing etc. >> >> brand: In a broader perspective... all this work with >> government open data and linked data should have started in a >> different way. Should have started with most interesting data >> and then move other data sets to the same direction >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> Brand: This should have started in a different >> way with the best data from the gov agencies in the best >> standards and then to move the rest of the data that way. >> >> brand: We tried to make data.gov that way but it ended up >> essentially being an IT project >> ... I'm writing a paper for the Japanese government. They >> started with CKAN. I've been asked to take the statistical data >> they have and put that into a standardised linked data format >> as well as the CKAN data >> ... It's all about trying to take the best data a country has >> first and then get the open data to match >> >> WWW2013 Brazil >> >> Jeanne_Holm: Are we interested in organising a session on >> eGov/Open data? >> ... It could be based on the social media Note that we should >> have published by then, possibly the one on open data by then >> too >> ... If we can come together in the coming weeks and see who >> wants to be involved - it's a good opportunity for the group >> >> General call for help with flights >> >> <bhyland> PhilA2: The W3C staff involved in Society & >> Technology Activity believe the tech stack is nearly complete. >> >> <bgryth> @bhyland - we would be happy to discuss lessons >> learned. Let me know how you'd like to do that. >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> PhilA2: OKF and UK ODI event on Open Data on the >> Web: use, discovery, find it programmatically, vocabulary >> development >> >> <bhyland> Next requirements involve: #1 - Validation; #2 - >> Programmatic & developer access & re-use of data; #3 - >> Vocabulary development (some being done in W3C GLD WG), looking >> to consider more 'crowd sourced' approaches ... >> >> <Jeanne_Holm> PhilA2: This is just tentative and may happen >> >> European data Forum 2013 [39]http://2013.data-forum.eu/ >> >> [39] http://2013.data-forum.eu/ >> >> <bhyland> European Data Forum, 9-10 April in Dublin Ireland … >> all about open data + Linked Data >> >> <bhyland> Yeah! >> >> Jeanne_Holm: Next meeting at this time is on 14th Dec >> ... Rufus Pollock is scheduled for the next IG meeting which is >> on 26th Nov 09:00GMT - bad for US folk, sorry >> ... Brain Handspicker has volunteered to scribe next time. >> >> <bhyland> @jeanne-holm, perhaps a 15 debrief on GLD WG >> including community directory work makes sense … a brief on >> what we've completed in last 16 mos & plan for remaining months >> of our charter (7 mos). >> >> <Daniel_Bennett> thanks Jeanne. volunteers can list their names >> on the Plans wiki page or email me daniel@citizencontact.com >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 09:48:31 UTC