W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Restarting W3C eGov Meetings and Roadmap

From: Holm, Jeanne M (1760) <jeanne.m.holm@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:28:09 +0000
To: Valayer Clémentine <clementine.valayer@trasysgroup.com>, "paoladimaio10@googlemail.com" <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>, "eGov IG (Public)" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CC0CC628.A99DD%Jeanne.M.Holm@jpl.nasa.gov>

Thanks so much.  This is very helpful.  Do you (or others) know if these
findings are still relatively true or have things either expanded or held


Jeanne Holm
Evangelist, Data.gov
U.S. General Services Administration
Cell: (818) 434-5037
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn: JeanneHolm

On 6/22/12 5:07 AM, "Valayer Clémentine"
<clementine.valayer@trasysgroup.com> wrote:

>Dear all,
>*Here is a benchmarking report on the state of eGovernment in Europe, at
>the Member State level. [Digitizing Public Services in Europe: Putting
>ambition into action - 9th Benchmark Measurement | December 2010]
>*The main activities of eGovernment in Spain are at the MINISTERIO DE
>HACIENDA Y ADMINISTRACIONES PUBLICAS, as an example: the technical
>interoperability standards case study
>http://www.epractice.eu/en/cases/eninti .
>*At the EU level, there are of course any initiatives, main ones being:
>-The eGovernment Action Plan,
>-The ISA workprogramme (Interoperability Solutions for EU Public
>Administrations) http://ec.europa.eu/isa/
>Clémentine Valayer|Practice Leader eGovernment|IS Strategy, Architecture
>& Organisation
>TRASYS - Terhulpsesteenweg 6C - 1560 Hoeilaart Belgium |
>Phone +32 2 893 17 84 - Mobile +32 473 93 76 87
>-----Original Message-----
>From: paoladimaio10@gmail.com [mailto:paoladimaio10@gmail.com] On Behalf
>Of Paola Di Maio
>Sent: 22 June 2012 13:43
>To: Holm, Jeanne M (1760)
>Cc: eGov IG (Public)
>Subject: Re: Restarting W3C eGov Meetings and Roadmap
>Jane and all
>additional thought:
>I presume the work being done here is intended to be of global reach,
>ie,applicable in principle to any country
>Having studied how egov knowledge domain is developing worldwide (the
>scope of W3C), I notice two easily identifiable poles:
>1. local jurisdictions/legislation .  national /regional boundaries seem
>to shape what is happening in egov for example, EU vs USA etc. But there
>are subregions, EU is not an even landscape, and presume the USA is not
>either. From a research viewpoint, may be interesting to map these
>jurisdictions.I am currently in Spain and the public administration I
>have spoken so far have never heard of eGovernment.. I wonder what is
>happening in other parts of the world.
>2. language/information channels -  the majority of work in PA is done in
>the local language, there seems to be a lot of asymmetry between the
>lexical /conceptual heritage in egov knowlege domain, depending i what
>language one is working, also different knowledge sets.
>A suggestion here may be that an egov shared vocab if adopted, should be
>translated also in local languages, therefore, would be nice to have
>local representatives from each jurisdiction participate in this WG
>On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
>> Dear Jeanne
>> thanks for the update
>> good to see a plan ahead, I ll aim to contribute when possible to this
>> interesting work
>> Skimmed through your mail and links, Just a couple of points:
>>> First, we will be resuming the meetings for the W3C eGov Interest
>>> Based on your responses to the survey, we will have a meeting every
>>> two weeks, with differing times to best reach your time zones:
>> what survey? - could find no link or is it an older one?
>>> We have published the draft roadmap document to the wiki at
>>> http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki. We welcome your comments and
>>> suggestions.
>> 1. the link to definition, does not redirect to a definition , as far
>> as I can see at my end (but good that there is a plan to evaluate the
>> definition)
>> 2. Any meaningful discussion, for example to address mechanics and
>> value proposition is constrained (ontologically) by the definitions
>> adopted, therefore I must insist on the suggestion that we need to
>> agree with a definition first, and the definition should be 'valid'
>> and functional to the purpose of e-government in the true sense.
>> 3. define some general vocabulary. Again, this is a recurring thing,
>> but the terminology/concepts that we adopt are likely to shape
>> discourse. for example, not just the definition of egov.
>> For example, I do not object to the word  'citizenry' , but I wonder
>> if we all use it in the same way. In the light of modern and
>> democratic constitutions that eGov emanates from (from what I
>> understand)  citizens are sovereign , therefore citizenry can be a
>> synonym of sovereignty Is this what is intended as 'citizenry' in the
>> charter
>> A bit nitpicking perhaps, but thats what i understand you are
>> soliciting as feedback,
>> Thank you, best
>> PDM
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2012 20:28:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:47 UTC