W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [DataGov-DEV] Updated Microdata to RDF Working Draft

From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:15:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CABzDd=5EnFdOgYq-_-XDDg_aQyc-XTd_Y3WCPwV=CTPLz+3zWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
Cc: egov-ig mailing list <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
> Ed, OMB's official guidance to agencies on implementation of section 10 of the GPRA Modernization Act (GPRAMA) says they may use XML, JSON, spreadsheets or CSVs in order to meet the requirement to publish their strategic and performance plans and reports in machine-readable format... but not PDF or HTML -- at least not without "enhanced structural elements".[1]

I couldn't help but chuckle at how [1] is a PDF. I get your point
however, which I think reinforces mine, that there is no US federal
policy that prefers RDFa 1.1 over HTML Microdata for publishing
metadata in HTML.

Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2012 02:15:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:50 UTC