W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > April 2012

open braindump/ e-governance as a whole

From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:57:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMXe=SotvQsSvz4f1cpCVOUibe8_Rfc1o+rXXR-PH7QscksSyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "eGov IG (Public)" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Few more thoughts :

Not sure if this is the best way to share thinking, but here is an
open/editable
braindump that aims to tackle the integration aspect of the issues at stake

I am trying to say  on Tomasz
proposed separation of issues:

https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1kWtUzVI17dwI4e22Kl7wdJ4AxmwO6lOTnQ6ElqktqRs/edit

 that we should aimto tackle
e-governance 'as a whole'to make it happen

(Please note I have a complex socio technical system of systems
perspective/bias )

1. Information technology (IT, the web, the internet)
are horizontal 'enablers' for each of the phases (taking as an
example those identified by T). That is, networked, distributed  technical
functionalities and processes can be applied to develop the themes in
synergy,
and to make sure they are cross referenced

2. what depends on why, and how depends on the relation between
what-why , so we should consider the what- why-how- when- who-
as a single key, if we want to slam this particular door open

3. similarly, consider the possible algorithm:

sustainability of e-governance is achieved if:
   planning IS driven by design,
    design  is carried out to support
implementation (and planning)
, which are determined by operations,

(not definitive, just offered as discussion - the relations between
these domains/themes should be extricated and represented
correctly in our mission statement)


P
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:07:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:07:55 GMT