W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > April 2012

Re: whats the plan then?

From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:51:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMXe=SreJf4jGUSnNYOEEDFNRkWuOz2iCpp8yJusQjsWyOB-Fg@mail.gmail.com>
To: bd@handspicker.net
Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, public-egov-ig@w3.org
Thank you Brian

(nice to meet you)

I should correct (or make clearer) what I intended to say. You are right,
not everyone has got something to say about everything (luckily thats just
a few of us who have such compulsive obsessions ;-)

But surely, everyone has something to say about something in relation to
the theme of the IG?

I was mostly referring to 'what does each of us think should be the
plan/roadmap for this group'?  and/or  what does each of us think our
definition for e-gov is/should be?

more on the other thread

P

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Brian D. Handspicker
<bd@handspicker.net>wrote:

> Paola,
>
> > to hear everybody's voice and opinion on every single issue
>
> There is the possibility that those of us who do not weigh in on every
> issue are mute because we don't have a strong position on every issue. I,
> for example, am most concerned with and speak up about issues associated
> with securely surfacing sensitive/private citizen data to individual
> citizens, data that is currently rarely web-accessible at all, let alone
> 5-star semantic-enabled data. Yet most of the discussions recently have
> been heavy on GLD and semantic web standards. Should I leave the group and
> have the group lose a "surface the hidden data" champion just because our
> group focus has been mostly public GLD oriented recently?
>
> Brian Handspicker
> NYS Office of Children and Family Services
>
> P.S. Congratulations Tomasz!
>
> > Phil
> >
> > thanks for reply
> >
> > I may not have welcomed/ congratulateD Tomasz on joining the team, let me
> > take the opportunity. (welcome Tomasz)
> >
> > However I 'd to understand (urgently) , if this workgroup adopts a
> > participatory practice, or not
> >
> > if it does, it is not up to you nor to Tomasz to
> > make the roadmap, but up to each list member
> > If a list member does not contribute their ideas /opinions, or have
> really
> > nothing to say ever, I wonder why they have joined.
> >
> > If the governance of this workgroup is by selected committee (another
> > elite?), then maybe this - at this stage -  is not  yet a community of
> >  self directed leaders I am hoping for :-)
> >
> > I would like each member to contribute to the roadmap, and to hear
> > everybody's voice and opinion on every single issue, because now we have
> > the technology to do so.  Members who do not have anything to say ever on
> > anything are lurkers, not members,(imho)
> >
> >  That's the e-governance I have in mind and I am interested in helping
> > co-create......
> >
> > Let me know if I should put my energies elsewhere :-)
> >
> > P
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Paola,
> >>
> >> Thanks for this timely message. As I hope you will have seen, the group
> >> has a new co-chair, Tomasz Janowski, who will be working with Jeanne,
> >> Sandro and I on this group. We are all aware of the need to set out a
> >> rejuvenated roadmap - it's coming, and soon.
> >>
> >> Phil.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24/04/2012 18:07, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> >>
> >>> Greetings, E-Gov SIG
> >>>
> >>> I am reviewing my ability to make useful contributions to various
> >>> communities
> >>> for the next semester, as I am travelling a lot, I find it difficult
> >>> to attend conference calls . Apologies for not being more active.
> >>>  (pulling own ears)
> >>>
> >>> I remain however interested in the topic, and realise I am not
> >>> sure who is on this group, and what are the goals of the memebers,
> >>> involvement with e-gov
> >>> and what can we learn from each other
> >>>
> >>> Apologies if I have missed out on something
> >>>
> >>> Can someone remind  please
> >>>
> >>> where is the wiki where people can enter their
> >>> contributions/suggestions
> >>> for talks/projects, our shared -participative agenda so to speak?
> >>>
> >>> would it be a good idea if each group member (willing to do so) to
> >>> give a short talk  in forthcoming months (also just a few asynchronous
> >>> slides) to introduce themselves
> >>> what do they do and what do they would like to achieve with the
> >>> participation
> >>> in this community, so that we share some knowledge and learn from each
> >>> other?
> >>>
> >>> I am working on distributed decision making processes for governance
> >>> and
> >>> policy
> >>> and would be glad to know if there is anyone around with similar
> >>> interests,
> >>> for example
> >>> s
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> PDM
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> Phil Archer
> >> W3C eGovernment
> >> http://www.w3.org/egov/
> >>
> >> http://philarcher.org
> >> +44 (0)7887 767755
> >> @philarcher1
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Brian D. Handspicker
> Managing Partner
> PracticalMarkets, LLC
> www.practicalmarkets.net
>
> Email: bd@handspicker.net
> Website: bd.handspicker.net
> Weblog: bd.handspicker.net/blog
> LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/bdhandspicker
>
> Albany Regional Office:
> 1-413-652-5029
> 243 Union Street, Suite 209
> North Adams, MA 01247 US
>
> Boston Regional Office:
> 1-978-456-5129
> 215 Ayer Road, Suite 233
> Harvard MA 01451 US
>
> This is a private correspondence from Brian D. Handspicker. Some of my
> messages are sent using mailing lists. If the "to" field in this message
> is blank or displays "undisclosed recipients" I sent this messages using a
> mailing list. CLICK HERE<mailto:bd@handspicker.net?subject=REMOVE> if you
> wish to be removed from my mailing list.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 09:52:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 09:52:16 GMT