W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > November 2010

Re: More Talk of a a Federalized Web

From: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <513476.71390.qm@web82407.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
To: Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au>
Cc: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>, Submit to W3C Egov IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Good point, Chris.  But just because the web is an international machine of 
mystery doesn't negate the benefits of having a google.nasa site AND a 
google.esa site (the latter the Euro Space Agency) - there would be a plethora 
of new TLD's in this scenario - in the hundreds...and all for great measure!

IMO :o)
 
Michael A. Norton
 




________________________________
From: Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au>
To: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
Cc: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>; Submit to W3C Egov IG 
<public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Fri, November 5, 2010 1:46:35 PM
Subject: Re: More Talk of a a Federalized Web


Federalised would be nice, except the web is international. A better start would 
be forcing the use of .us for ALL US domains to level the playing field to the 
standard as written.

IMO :)

Chris Beer (iPhone)

On 06/11/2010, at 3:56, Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com> wrote:


On a federalized web, I could go to sirius.fcc, bp.epa, caltech.hhs, 
microsoft.law, and laidlaw.sec and check, respectively, this company's spectrum 
purchasing history, that company's conservation efforts, this school's medical 
record activity, that company's volume of legal data, and this company's public 
financial statements, and vice versa, while each company's marketing efforts I 
don't have to worry about, because I'm not at .com, I'm on the federal web! 
> 
>Michael A. Norton
>  
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
>To: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
>Sent: Wed, November 3, 2010 5:33:47 PM
>Subject: Re: What if ... A Federalized Web
>
>
>Outside the US, nobody knows what "FCC" means though ...
>
>Wouldn't that be a problem ?  It would be nice to have a purl.org/usa/gov/xxx 
>forwarding service though.  
>
>
>--- On Wed, 11/3/10, Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>From: Mike Norton <xsideofparadise@yahoo.com>
>>Subject: Re: What if ... A Federalized Web
>>To: "Gannon Dick" <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
>>Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010, 7:21 PM
>>
>>
>>operative word is "front man" - it would be interesting to be able to to 
>>traverse URLs such as google.fcc, nbc.fcc, yahoo.fcc, fox.fcc, etc. while doing 
>>the great service that FCC is supposed to provide.   SEO mavericks such as 
>>Google itself could then genrate such lists as "Top 10 Most Active FCC 
>>Companies" and likewise "Top 10 Most FCC Fined Companies" and Top 100's, etc.
>> 
>>Michael A. Norton
>>  
>
>
>


      
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 21:01:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 5 November 2010 21:01:36 GMT