RE: [dcat] Tomorrow's dcat Agenda

Hi all,

 

Richard says...

One of the things I'd like to address in today's call is to understand  

any use cases or requirements that cannot be met well by an RDF-only  

solution

 

I think that this is hard to prove. 

But, there might be interesting to direct the question the other way
around...

...to identify use cases or requirements that specifically need an RDF
solution, so as to see the limitation of the non-rdf solutions. This
makes sense to me... 

 

Regards,

Vassilios

 

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Cyganiak
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:29 PM
To: Erik Wilde
Cc: public-egov-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: [dcat] Tomorrow's dcat Agenda

 

Erik,

 

On 21 Apr 2010, at 18:33, Erik Wilde wrote:

>>
http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Data_Catalog_Vocabulary#Links_and_Resources

> 

> http://recovery.berkeley.edu/ might be a good addition to that list.  

> as you know, it is explicitly not using a semweb approach, but it  

> certainly addresses the question of how to expose government data in  

> a lightweight and web-friendly way.

 

In fact, your paper that reports on this work was already listed in  

that section (under "non-RDF approaches"). I added the link to the  

recovery.berkeley.edu site as well.

 

One of the things I'd like to address in today's call is to understand  

any use cases or requirements that cannot be met well by an RDF-only  

solution, so input from those who have experience with, or have a  

preference for, Atom, JSON, OPML etc will be especially important today.

 

Richard

 

 

 

> 

> thanks,

> 

> erik wilde   tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814

>       dret@berkeley.edu  -  http://dret.net/netdret

>       UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)