- From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:48:06 +0100
- To: "Owen Ambur" <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: eGov IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, John Sheridan <John.Sheridan@nationalarchives.gov.uk>
Owen, thanks much for getting this started. Although it was John who proposed it, I was actioned to remind the list. I hope I got it right. The plan is to propose topics to have a provocation/reflection/action approach: 1) dedicate morning(s) to "provoke" with burning issues 2) analyze how those could be addressed 3) come up with actions that the Group should take and where it would be of most help I'm not sure if we should stick to the proposed structure around topics or if it would be better to do the provocation part in the first morning/afternoon on all topics, then move from there. -- Jose ps: this closes ACTION-45 El 18/02/2009, a las 17:23, Owen Ambur escribió: > Per discussion on the telecon this morning, I added a few > provocation statements to the draft agenda athttp://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/F2F2 > > BTW, the deadline for proposed additions to the FEA TRM was January > 31 -- http://et.gov/stage4.htm -- meaning that it may not be > possible to incorporate additional changes until next year … which > in turn means the TRM is virtually guaranteed to become irrelevant > due to being out-dated. > > Owen Ambur > Co-Chair Emeritus, xmlCoP > Co-Chair, AIIM StratML Committee > Member, AIIM iECM Committee > Invited Expert, W3C eGov IG > Communications/Membership Director, FIRM Board > Former Project Manager, ET.gov > Brief Bio >
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 14:48:51 UTC