W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Contributing to the working draft

From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:47:58 +0200
Cc: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>, eGovIG IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, Christopher Testa <ctesta@ushmm.org>, "Ken Fischer ClickForHelp.com" <ken@clickforhelp.com>
Message-Id: <E5331A42-D85C-4E38-841C-FFD1BE94C53C@w3.org>
To: "Miguel A. Amutio Gómez" <miguel.amutio@map.es>
That would be awesome!


El 15/04/2009, a las 9:52, Miguel A. Amutio Gómez escribió:
> Hi Josema,
> I could integrate and tweak a bit contributions on "Multi-Channel"  
> section.
> I´ll try to send the whole thing before the call.
> Regards,
> Miguel A.
> Jose M. Alonso escribió:
>> Hi Kendall,
>> The editor's draft is at:
>>  http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/Group/docs/note
>> Deadline to submit content for the empty sections, namely "Multi- 
>> Channel" and "Long Term" is today. I've seen two contributions on  
>> "Multi-Channel" from two different points of view sent yesterday to  
>> this list about the topic. I think that if someone can integrate  
>> and tweak a bit with comments already made will make a great "Multi- 
>> Channel" section and expect to discuss on the call today. I also  
>> expect Chris Testa to submit something on "Long Term" today.
>> The draft is also open for comments until April 26, so also good  
>> time to add stuff to the other sections there. How to? I propose  
>> you to open an issue about the section you are interested in and  
>> then provide some text on the wiki or by email to the list. I think  
>> it's better to have consensus around changes to the document. You  
>> might be also interested in these threads:
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-egov-ig/2009Mar/0004
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-egov-ig/2009Apr/0000
>> Cheers,
>> Jose.
>> El 15/04/2009, a las 1:48, Kendall Clark escribió:
>>> Folks,
>>> Are future drafts of
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-egov-improving-20090310/ in the offing?
>>> If so, I'd like to contribute text to the semantic web section in
>>> order to round out the picture of what's relevant, deployed, useful,
>>> etc in this context.
>>> I suppose, then, that I'm asking what the process is for  
>>> contributing
>>> to the document? Please forgive me if this is a FAQ.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kendall Clark
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 10:48:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:40 UTC