- From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:57:54 +0100
- To: washingtona@acm.org
- Cc: John Sheridan <John.Sheridan@nationalarchives.gov.uk>, Kevin Novak <kevinnovak@aia.org>, public-egov-ig@w3.org
Hi Anne, I see john took the action. AFAIR, because of these two UK projects: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/electronicrecords/digitalcontinuity/ http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webcontinuity/ If you both could briefly document the use case, I think that should suffice for this topic area. Of course, before/after examples would be *very* helpful. Side notes: I already converted the topic areas to products in the tracker. So this is related to ACTION-17 (this way tracker should add this email automatically to the ACTION comments :) Unfortunately I see no way of actioning two people for the same action, so I'm creating a separate one related to the product for you. Thanks much! Jose. El 29/10/2008, a las 16:45, Anne Washington escribió: > I can work on the persistent identifier use case. http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/track/actions/17 > Is there anyone else interested in teaming up with me? > > I used handle technology to create persistent URLs to U.S. > Congressional legislation. We've been working on this project since > 2005. Although it is listed as G2C interaction, we built this more > for internal G2G clients who are more likely to build websites that > frequently use our links. An external help page was recently made > available about the project. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/handles/help.html > > Some background: The Library of Congress has been using handles for > about ten years. The CNRI, Corporation for National Research > Initiatives, handle system is described in more detail at http://www.handle.net/faq.html > . An early review of the use of handles at the Library can be found > at http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/award/docs/handle-server.html . > > Below is the email announcement about the project. > Announcing permanent links to THOMAS > > Permanent simple links are now available to access legislation in > THOMAS (http://thomas.loc.gov). The legislative handles project will > provide persistent access to Congressional digital collections held > at the Library of Congress. Legislative handles are a convenient way > to cite legislation in bibliographies, emails, blogs, or web pages. > The current link structure has not changed. Legislative handles are > an additional way to access content on THOMAS. > > How to create a legislative handle > To create a legislative handle, start with http:// followed by > hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/ Add the name of the collection, a > period, and the Congress number legislation.110 Immediately type > the bill abbreviation and the bill number without punctuation. This > handle will resolve to the Bill Summary and Status page. For example: > http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.110hconres196 > http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.110sres69 > > Specific questions can be sent to the Library's Ask-A-Librarian > service. http://www.loc.gov/rr/askalib/ask-digital.html > For the complete legislative handle syntax and more information, see > the THOMAS handles help page http://thomas.loc.gov/home/handles/help.html > . > > > Anne Washington > Standards work - washingtona@acm.org > Work work - awashington@crs.loc.gov > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Jose M. Alonso wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:45:01 +0100 >> From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org> >> To: Jeff Sonstein <jeffs@it.rit.edu> >> Cc: public-egov-ig@w3.org >> Subject: volunteering for topic areas and use cases -- Re: [agenda] >> eGov IG >> call, 29 Oct 2008 >> Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:45:47 +0000 >> Resent-From: public-egov-ig@w3.org >> >>>>> ... >>>>> Agenda [...] >>>>> 6. Assign people (+use cases) to areas >>>>> * open actions: http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/track/actions/ >>>>> open >>>>> * use cases: http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Cases >>>> I would request that the meeting facilitator insure that >>>> we get to this item early on >>>> so that I can be a part of the use-case area assignments... >>> Ok. >>> I expect the Group to spend most of the meeting on this agendum >>> and the previous one "Review of the Topic Areas." >> >> By the way, no need to wait for the call. If you are interested in >> any of the areas and/or you think there's something missing there, >> we can discuss by email. >> >> I already mentioned I miss one topic area on "Multi-channel delivery" >> >> Cheers, >> Jose. >> >>
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 09:58:36 UTC