On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:04 AM, public-egov-ig@w3.org wrote: > Thanks for doing this, Jeff. it is just a very-rough start if folks seriously want to develop a data structure and a controlled vocabulary within which to express ideas feedback from anyone on how this could be structured or constrained to become a more useful tool to organize their thinking? > As far as the glossary is concerned, I'll be interested to learn > whether > there are good reasons not to use the W3C's SKOS -- > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ say some more about that please > BTW, if RIT has a strategic plan, I'd like to render it in StratML > format > for inclusion in our collection at > http://xml.gov/stratml/index.htm#EdInstitutions Although there are > now more > than 370 plans in the collection, thus far we only have a > couple .edu plans. I'll look into this after next week's end-of-term exams and the subsequent grading frenzy <grin/> jeffs -- "I don't want to be taken to your leader. I've already met him." - Eddie Gaedel - ============ Prof. Jeff Sonstein http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/ http://chw.rit.edu/blog/ http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/emailDisclaimer.htmlReceived on Thursday, 6 November 2008 23:56:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 November 2008 23:56:25 GMT