W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > June 2008

structuring the wiki [was: Re: XBC use cases]

From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:50:23 +0200
Cc: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "Amit Parashar" <amit.parashar@csiro.au>, public-egov-ig@w3.org, "Ari Schwartz" <ari@cdt.org>, "Óscar Azañón" <oscarae@princast.es>, "Christopher Testa" <ctesta@ushmm.org>, "Kevin Novak" <kevinnovak@aia.org>
Message-Id: <D099A506-E320-435A-9D95-0754D35ABB75@w3.org>
To: Bruce Eggum <bruceeggum@gmail.com>

El 27/06/2008, a las 17:51, Bruce Eggum escribió:
> Thanks Jose, I agree and like the form  http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case

We could also do that directly all in the same page.
I'd say that the most advanced wiki at W3C is that of the RIF Working  
Group:

   http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_Working_Group

We could probably get some ideas from there.


> I am not familiar with wiki and do not know how to add things. This  
> form (editable) would allow users to initiate matters, than a wiki  
> person could move it to desired location. Bruce

I'm not an expert (yet!) but all the pages have a menu on top with an  
"edit" link, and once they have content also specific sections can be  
made editable.

Only Group participants can edit pages. They need to create an account  
and ask me or Kevin to give them editing rights.

Jose.



> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>  
> wrote:
>
> El 27/06/2008, a las 10:43, Robin Berjon escribió:
>
> Hi Amit,
> On Jun 27, 2008, at 01:34 , Amit Parashar wrote:
> I think that your suggestions are good.  I think it will help focus  
> everyone
> and perhaps this could be an item for the next phone meeting?
>
> I think the best way to know if this approach would be helpful or  
> not would be to start collecting use cases for the three task  
> forces, and it would be great if that could be started before the  
> next call even. I noticed that the wiki now has sections for the  
> various TFs, I don't know what the Co-ordinators intend to do but  
> maybe we should start filling them out?
>
> It was me who put those placeholders in there. I encourage  
> coordinators to speak up about any specific plans and let's discuss  
> about it.
>
> For example, our PLING colleagues started this way:
>  http://www.w3.org/Policy/pling/wiki/UseCases
>
> We could do something like that or come up with a *very* simple wiki  
> template for every case that could be reused:
>  http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case
>
> and maybe a convention for the wiki page names, maybe:  
> UseCase_TitleGoesHere
>
> I'd like to see something a bit more specific though, so comparison  
> of cases won't be too difficult. Ideas?
>
> Josema.
>
>
> --
> Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>    W3C/CTIC
> eGovernment Lead                  http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/
>
>
>
> -- 
> Bruce Eggum
> Gresham Wisconsin, USA
> http://www.doinggovernment.com/
> Check out my Blog too
> http://bruceeggum.blogster.com/
> http://usinitiative.com
>
> vote
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 18:51:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 June 2008 18:51:06 GMT