W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > July 2008

RE: structuring the wiki [was: Re: XBC use cases]

From: Oscar Azanon <oscarae@princast.es>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:57:41 +0200
To: "'Peristeras, Vassilios'" <vassilios.peristeras@deri.org>
Cc: <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, "'Jose M. Alonso'" <josema@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1KGFa0-00046g-2c@bart.w3.org>

 
Vassilios,

That's precisely the area I'm focusing on my first use cases - service
discovery, description, delivery, composition / aggregation, etc. so I can't
agree more with you. Though I'm not thinking precisely in terms of SOA (more
on this soon), there is definitely room for improvement in this area. 

I'm very interested in any information / pointers you may have.

Regards,

ocr


-----Original Message-----
From: Peristeras, Vassilios [mailto:vassilios.peristeras@deri.org] 
Sent: martes, 08 de julio de 2008 10:50
To: Oscar Azaņon Esteire
Cc: public-egov-ig@w3.org; Jose M. Alonso
Subject: RE: structuring the wiki [was: Re: XBC use cases]

Hi Oscar,

I see that the "Seamless Integration of Data" Task Force has already taken
off with the inclusion of the very interesting STRATML specifications. Well
done!
Two issues:
I attach here a paper we wrote some years ago that proposes a kind of a
strategic model for public sector organizations. I am not sure if this can
be of usage at this stage for STRAML but I think it is at least relevant
(e.g. see figure 4 for a strategic model).
Another direction that I see interesting for this TF is the idea of a common
approach for describing in a generic fashion a public administration service
model. This would have certain benefits in a SOA environment that then could
use these common descriptions for facilitating discovery, composition,
invocation, etc of public services. Several attempts both from researchers
and governments have already taken place towards this direction (e.g. GOVML,
GEA, GCIM). If you are interested in this direction I could provide further
information, and references.
As at 15:00 CET tomorrow I will be just landing returning back from a trip,
I expect to join the conf with some delay at around 15:40 CET.

Best regards,
Vassilios
 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Oscar Azaņon Esteire
Sent: 04 July 2008 14:26
To: public-egov-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: structuring the wiki [was: Re: XBC use cases]


Hi all,

 I have uploaded a first proposal for an Use Case Template to the wiki
(http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case_Template). Please feel free to
add/delete/modify anything directly (I believe we should all have the
appropriate permissions). If anyone prefers that we discuss things
internally on the list rather than on the Wiki directly, please let me know
and we can have a look at that too - in this case i'd say the wiki is a nice
tool for this but you may think different.

 The items of information have grown a little bit from 'name' and
'description'. I have uploaded an introducion on why more information is
needed - for instance, we need to assess a given use case in terms of the
impact it can have on people, public administrations, implementation
feasibility, related initiatives/standards, etc. This is open ground for
discussion and I'm really looking forward to get your point of view.

 BTW - if anyone has already identified any use case, please do not
heasitate to post it on the list or directly on the wiki even if unfinished.

 UCs can be posted here:
http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case_Template. 

 cheers!

 ocr


--
Oscar Azaņon Esteire
oscarae@princast.es
Tel: 985 10 5997
Tel: 984 39 0628
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2008 16:03:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 July 2008 16:03:33 GMT