- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 08:09:23 -0400
- To: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- CC: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, Xiaoqian Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>
On 5/22/15 1:31 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: > I personally don't have any license preference. But it would be > preferable if it could all be under the same license so the terms are > clear. Also, it should be whatever is the standard for the w3c. I presume work on the four documents Ben started (inputEvents.html and the 3 contentEditable*.html specs) will be continued so I just changed those documents to use the ED template and that automagically gives them the `standard` w3c copyright. > I hope there is someone with more legal knowledge than me on this list > who is looking into this. I did not change execCommand.html, primarily because it appears this group might not progress that document "as is". However, if the group does agree to work on it, then yes, we seek advice on how to handle that document's copyright. -Thanks, ArtB
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2015 12:09:33 UTC