Re: Missing HTTP status code from RFC6585

Hi John,

Unfortunately EARL is currently not being actively maintained.

If you're comfortable sharing, possibly also off list, would you let us 
know more about your uses for this vocabulary? Are there other parts of 
the EARL family of specs that you use?

Here is more about EARL, in case you have been using this spec only:
  - https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/earl

Regards,
   Shadi


On 18/07/2017 15:33, John Walker wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The RDF data in http://www.w3.org/2011/http-statusCodes is missing the HTTP status codes 428, 429, 431 and 511 as defined by [RFC6585].
> 
> Is it possible to add these?
> 
> John
> 
> [RFC6585] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6585.txt
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Tuesday, 18 July 2017 14:27:32 UTC