- From: Lars G. Svensson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:18:10 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@aisaac [scripsit](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1105#issuecomment-536338636): > For 3 you are right, but we still can say that it belongs to a family. It's actually easier to present a family in a specific document where editors present their related work in different spaces, rather than on a W3C group page where it may be more awkward to list documents from other spaces. and > (such as making sure the IETF document is not mistaken as an output from the WG) I'm a bit surprised over this comment, since you over at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/575#issuecomment-483711391 wrote: > 4. It still holds! To me the IETF ID (and issue 380) is a PROF document, even if it's not in W3C space, and thus doesn't belong to related work. It is (y)our work. -- GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1105#issuecomment-536435395 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 30 September 2019 07:18:11 UTC