- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:56:15 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@matthiaspalmer , based on what you say, there's actually some confusion. Properties `prov:wasAttributedTo` / `dcat:hadRole` has been added in order to provide a standard pattern to be used to express roles not available in existing vocabularies, and specifically in [DCTERMS]. So, if you want to use a role from [DCTERMS] which is not explicitly included in DCAT (as `dct:contributor`), you should indeed use it, and you should not `prov:wasAttributedTo` / `dcat:hadRole` for that. This is basically the sense of all the passages you quote, and you can probably find more background information in the use cases that triggered this feature in DCAT2 - see, e.g., https://www.w3.org/TR/dcat-ucr/#ID13 So, answering your questions: > **Should dct:contributor be expressed as a direct property?** YES > **Should dct:contributor be expressed via prov:wasAttributedTo?** NO -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1065#issuecomment-533142380 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2019 13:56:16 UTC