- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 23:52:03 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
This was discussed in the prof meeting and all agree its an area where we know we only have first cut, but the separation of roles (which may have many variations and nuances are business for communities of practice) however, in accordance with @aisaac suggestion if we have a set of useful ones we have consensus about we can bring them into the core, leaving "at risk" ones in an extension vocabulary. This is the main issue open that looks like it may result in some refactoring of and/or changes to the normative model - and hence its a priority to discuss in meetings and achieve consensus. The Google doc is just background we can go back to - but any substantive issue raised in it and not addressed needs to be brought into the most appropriate, resolvable, issue. Within that strategy, separate issues could be created to isolate specific proposals or illustrate evidence where a known example does not fit well with the options proposed. In this issue we can address general questions - and so I will lead off with a separate comment.. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1049#issuecomment-528650429 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2019 23:52:04 UTC