- From: Karen Coyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 18:57:51 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@nicholascar The reason for closing needs to be the resolution of the issue. Above you say: "This issue has been addressed in PR #664" - however, that doesn't say HOW it was addressed. So something like "prof:BaseSpecification was removed from the document" would be more helpful, and that will also give better information for the management review as they are not going to want to wander through all of the comments to understand the resolution of issues. The clearer the closing comment the better for you in terms of supporting PROF. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/641#issuecomment-527224547 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 2 September 2019 18:57:53 UTC