- From: Philippe Rocca-Serra via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:04:11 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I am closely following this issue and would be interested in obtaining guidance from the group on how best to represent a `dcat:Dataset` that would have `dcat:Dataset` as its parts. If I understand correctly, the group leans towards creating `dcat:DatasetSeries` class but this won't be happening before v3 so do I get right that the `recommended` way would be to rely on `dcat:qualifiedRelation` should anyone attempt to represent such an aggregate dataset? I was wondering if the group could document an example on how to do so? Finally, I was wondering if the group could document what is the main reason against adding `hasPart` relation to `dcat:Dataset` class? -- GitHub Notification of comment by proccaserra Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/868#issuecomment-552549887 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 November 2019 18:04:13 UTC