Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)

@riccardoAlbertoni You seem to be saying what I said [above](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1130#issuecomment-548827214), but Richard said:

>CatalogRecord.conformsTo should identify the 'standard' that the dcat record at CatalogRecord.foaf:PrimaryTopic conforms to

which sounds to me like it is applying `dcat:catalogRecord1 dct:conformsTo` to the object of foaf:PrimaryTopic. Could we get this as code, Richard? Because I'm not sure what "the dcat record at CatalogRecord.foaf:PrimaryTopic" means - are you referring to the object of the triple:

```
CatalogRecord foaf:PrimaryTopic [Richard's dcat record here]
```

And if Makx is saying what I said at my comment then I don't know why he didn't simply say that he agrees with what I had said. I thought he was making another point. 

I said:
>
```
ex:catalogRecord1 dct:conformsTo ex:DCATv2
```
is a statement about the specification of the rules for the catalog record, and only the catalog record.
 
And Makx replied:
>As far as I am concerned, the statement ex:catalogRecord1 dct:conformsTo ex:DCATv2 does say something about the set of metadata statements that describe the dataset. 

So, Makx, were you disagreeing with me? Agreeing? What do you mean by "the set of metadata statements that describe the dataset"? Can you give an example in code so that it is clearer?

Let's clarify this with code because this will only be clear if we use precise language, meaning the actual DCAT properties. I get quite confused with things like "left-hand metadata record" and would like to see examples as code rather than high-level diagrams so we can be sure that the diagrams match the properties defined in DCAT and that we're all talking about the same thing. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1130#issuecomment-549064862 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 2 November 2019 17:34:00 UTC