Re: Poll for DXWG to Proposed Recommendation

Hi Linda
This poll is to agree to go forward with the transition to putting DCAT
version 2 draft forward for recommendation as the new standard
Cheers
Peter

On Wed, 15 May 2019, 08:40 Linda van den Brink, <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> Dear Pedro,
>
>
>
> I apologise as I have not been able to follow the work on DCAT v2 closely
> and I apologise in advance if the question I have stems from my omission to
> do so.
>
>
>
> I’m confused by the proposed transition to Proposed Recommendation. I’ve
> not been able to find a published Candidate Recommendation, which is
> normally the preceding stage in a w3c document’s lifecycle. I did find a
> recent proposal to transition the draft to a new stage but it was to
> transition to Candidate rec, not Proposed rec.
>
>
>
> Can you please clarify?
>
>
>
> Linda van den Brink
>
>
>
> *Van:* pedro winstley <pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com>
> *Verzonden:* zondag 12 mei 2019 23:53
> *Aan:* Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>;
> team-dxwg-chairs@w3.org; Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>; Karen Coyle <
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
> *Onderwerp:* Poll for DXWG to Proposed Recommendation
>
>
>
> Dear Colleagues
>
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/DCAT_PR/  is a poll asking for your
> views about the proposal to transition the DCAT Version 2 draft to Proposed
> Recommendation.
>
>
>
> Please can you complete as soon as possible, and before 20 May.
>
>
>
> Note that this is for version 2.  There are aspects such as versioning
> that have been held back in the github backlog for the next version.
>
>
>
> Many thanks
>
>
>
> Peter
>