We’ve run out of time for me to make any more changes (1am Saturday night here in Aus and DSR is now unavailable in the UK too) but rest assured that we are still discussing the “semantic and terminology of profiling”. This is the big issue slated for the 3PWD as we look to align PROF and the Conneg doc. I’m glad we’ve got to their most interesting aspect of the profiling discussion too. I suppose the pause means no 3PWD for a while though. Nick Nicholas Car Senior Experimental Scientist CSIRO nicholas.car@csiro.au<mailto:nicholas.car@csiro.au> | 0477 560 177 On 30 Mar 2019, at 7:53 pm, Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>> wrote: Drop a class=issue paragraph in drawing attention to the issue(s) where it is still under discussion? ________________________________ From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de<mailto:L.Svensson@dnb.de>> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 7:02:21 AM To: pedro winstley; Dataset Exchange Working Group Subject: RE: Poll for the publication of the PROF 2nd PWD Hi all, I just submitted a _weak_ „yes“ to publication. I. e. if others are fine, I’m not blocking. That said, I _really_ think we should add a reference to #802 – particularly @smrgeoinfo’s comment [1] – somewhere around prof:isProfileOf/prof:isTransitiveProfileOf [2] just to show that we’re still discussing semantics and terminology of profiling. [1] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/802#issuecomment-477243748 [2] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/#Property:isProfileOf Best, Lars From: pedro winstley [mailto:pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 1:40 PM To: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>> Subject: Poll for the publication of the PROF 2nd PWD Dear WG members Please can you reply to the following poll at your earliest convenience. https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/PROF2PWD/ Kind regards Karen & Peter : Chairs
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2019 15:11:47 UTC