[dxwg] Moving some PROF material to an "advanced" section? (#856)

aisaac has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:

== Moving some PROF material to an "advanced" section? ==
In #642  I have expressed a concerned that some properties (at prof:transitiveProfileOf) look like 'utility properties' that are of lesser interest for most implementers. I.e. these implementers could mint their own property and derived statements with it from other statements, the same way that skos:broaderTransitive is in SKOS.
At a minimum, they could be kept for amateurs only ;-) and put in an "advanced" section.

@andrea-perego and @akuckartz have expressed some level of support.

Of course this is not an urgent issue, perhaps not even in the medium term, but it would be nice to help readers get a better feeling of the level of 'core-ness' of the various PROF properties.

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/856 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 28 March 2019 09:38:15 UTC