- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:11:05 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Rob, that "sprint" was the one that was announced for times that no one could attend except you a Nick. The Doodle poll that we asked for was for a meeting the following week, not those same times. (All of this is in emails.) There was no agenda, no minutes - so we do not know who attended or what was decided. The W3C process requires openness - setting meetings for maximum attendance, reporting back on decisions, showing how decisions were made, providing minutes for record-keeping. The Google Doc is getting active comments, and I think with a little work we could set up some polls. Those polls would then be evidence of consensus reached. Meanwhile, I hope that Makx can weigh in because he was one of the people who wanted the definitions improved and he has commented quite a bit on the Google Doc. Nothing should go to commit unless the folks who are involved have been consulted. It isn't fair to them to ask them to work on it and then not get their agreement (active agreement) on changes. In the W3C process, silence is just that: silence. You need active consent. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/827#issuecomment-474632912 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2019 00:11:06 UTC