W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] Profile guidance definitions (#418)

From: Heidi Vanparys via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:17:34 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-472747608-1552551453-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> def of specification
> "an act of" is not the def we want. we use it to discuss a thing, not an act.

It seems that the wrong definition from [Oxford English Dictionary](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/specification) was chosen. The one referred to in the guidance refers to the process of specifying, the one actually meant is the one that should refer the the outcome of specifying.

[Oxford English Dictionary](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/specification) also has a definition for the outcome, _a detailed description of the design and materials used to make something_.

However, it is probably too narrow for this profile guidance. Then the first definition from [Oxford Learner's Dictionary of Academic English](https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/academic/specification) (which is the same as the definition at [Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary](https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/specification)) is probably more suited: _a detailed description of how something is, or should be, designed or made_.

![specification](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11427611/54341178-8336d600-4639-11e9-8d9d-59d40d182e7a.jpg)

So could a solution for "specification" be replacing the definition with _detailed description of how something is, or should be, designed or made_?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by heidivanparys
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/418#issuecomment-472747608 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2019 08:17:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:08 UTC