W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)

From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:29:21 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-471465241-1552296560-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@rob-metalinkage said:

> i think we only need one role at this stage, because the format and the profile the artifact conforms to will provide information about "how it works"

Not sure I completely get your point. What is needed is to say that X (e.g., the GeoDCAT-AP XSLT) provides mappings from A (e.g., ISO 19115) to B (GeoDCAT-AP). This of course needs to be modelled with relationships. Whether these relationships correspond or not to roles, this of course depends on whether roles are concepts (as it is now in PROF) or relationships themselves.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/731#issuecomment-471465241 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 March 2019 09:29:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 20 March 2019 21:59:27 UTC