W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

[dxwg] PROF relationship to other vocabularies (#797)

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:46:13 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-417873246-1551887172-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
kcoyle has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:

== PROF relationship to other vocabularies ==
From Leslie Sikos

Relationship with standard and de facto standard vocabularies and ontologies, such as Dublin Core, PROV-O, and SKOS, should be defined (more) clearly in the specification and formally in the ontology file itself. For example, the range of :isTransitiveProfileOf is defined to be dct:Standard—much more similar definitions would be needed.

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019Jan/0020.html

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/797 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2019 15:46:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:08 UTC