W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)

From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 22:53:49 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-469891913-1551826428-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Original suggestions by @kcoyle:

> remove boxes denoting classes. The class'ness is included in the definition of the properties (their domains)

I've redrafted the diagram to remove these

> resolve the issue of Standard X and "has resource" (the other option is that PROF has to become an ontology for both non-profiled standards as well as profiles)

I've bypassed this by just using an example where a Profile inherits a Resource from another Profile, not a Standard. While not incorrect, as @rob-metalinkage says in his first comment, there's no need to specifically bring in that detail into this example so we can reduce complexity here.

From @aisaac:

>For the record, I've also put some editorial input at #642 (comment)
Would it help if it's copied here, or is it ok to leave it there?

You can leave the comment there. I think I've addressed all your points in this new release.

Comments from @fellahst & @andrea-perego:

Important comments but this Issue, 731, is narrow so I'm going to address it here and transfer OGC-related thoughts to another.

![isinheritedfrom](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7321872/53842707-f6ae6700-3feb-11e9-85c8-cf53048717d7.png)

This diagram is now in PR https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/790




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/731#issuecomment-469891913 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2019 22:53:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 14 March 2019 16:33:09 UTC