Re: Profiles Vocab sprint this week - choose time?

I agree with Karen that creating a doodle poll is a good idea - we have
also other pending meetings such as the DCAT sprint or a profgui meeting so
availability will depend on those being confirmed.

Thanks
Alejandra

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 18:06, pedro winstley <pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Nick
>
> It is good to get a specific list of activities to work on but I am in
> Berlin at the W3C graph databases meeting, and Karen has mentioned that she
> cannot make this.  We/you *need* to ensure that we have several people
> involved in these drafting sprints, so please can you suggest some other
> times.  I for one will be more available next week.
>
> Best
>
> Peter
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 12:10, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park)
> <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob & I would like to run a sprint this week to grind through some of the
>> pressing Profiles Vocab issues for a next PWD release, in particular:
>>
>>
>>
>>    - Moving some ResourceDescriptor roles from the stand-alone vocab
>>    into the main vocab
>>       - We need agreement on the set of roles to move (core/common roles)
>>    - Addressing the use of dct:format for ResourceDescriptors
>>       - And whether the use of this DCAT pattern means we are really
>>       cataloguing Distributions of a profile and thus more DCAT semantics
>>       can/should be used
>>    - Closing as many issues as possible
>>       - Especially those tagged with 2PWD:
>>       https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22PROF+2PWD%22
>>
>>
>>
>> We propose one of the two timeslots for a 2-hour sprint:
>>
>>
>>
>> 21-23:00 UTC, Wednesday 6th
>>
>> 10-12:00 UTC, Thursday, 7th
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob and I can make either time so if people who would like to attend
>> could please indicate a preference by reply to this (numbers should be
>> manageable via email, rather than Doodle) then we will go with the most
>> preferred.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2019 18:19:31 UTC