W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)

From: Jaroslav Pullmann via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 23:38:44 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-469472012-1551742723-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@makxdekkers I see your point, normally it would not be individual meta-data instances but the entire catalog of interest to harvesters. In this case the policies are covered by dcat:Catalog/[dct:rights](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Property:catalog_rights) or a [dct:licence](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Property:catalog_license) reference. The UC was reflecting talks to industrial partners that were interested in a role of data broker (by means of curated, valuable metadata), where the catalog or individual resource metadata may be considered a policy target.  
@kcoyle how to proceed with the UC? It still seems valid to care about (conditions of) reusing DCAT meta-data, but it will not be tackled anew by the group ("wan't fix"), since a solution on catalog-level exists?

GitHub Notification of comment by jpullmann
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/9#issuecomment-469472012 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 4 March 2019 23:38:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:08 UTC