W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

[dxwg] DCAT Document - where do alignments/relations to other vocabs actually belong? (#715)

From: David Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:21:05 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-404792881-1548858061-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
davebrowning has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:

== DCAT Document - where do alignments/relations to other vocabs actually belong? ==
We currently have three sections that talk about alignment/relationship  of DCAT with other vocabularies.  These are [Section 13](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#alignments) (non-normative), [Section 16](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#other-w3c-recommendations) (currently normative.... including the output from #254) and [Appendix A](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#alignments-domains) (non-normative). 

It would be good to have a clear and obvious rationale here - are we happy with the current structure?  Would it be better to have the non-normative alignments included in a primer or other more discursive document?

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/715 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2019 14:21:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:06 UTC