W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:23:30 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-458173747-1548689009-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
"Also, we should recommend that if someone wants general properties like titles, descriptions, Agent relations, one should just use ADMS or DCAT properties with the alignments here in mind. Prevents us having to describe dct:title etc. use." 

Anyone can say anything about anything so I don't think it is necessary to say that people can use whatever vocabularies they want to further describe the classes and properties in PROF - it's an RDF vocabulary and therefore by definition they can. I think the better question to address why PROF is what it is, and to clearly define PROF as providing a kind of macro context over profile resources. Then people can decide if that's a need that they have.

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/529#issuecomment-458173747 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 28 January 2019 15:23:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:06 UTC