W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] add RFC 6906 to profiles ontology (#629)

From: Lars G. Svensson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:34:03 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-455607502-1547829241-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@dret Thanks for your feedback. So would it solve this issue if we added some text to [§5 Related Work](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#relatedwork) of the Conneg by AP guidance document?

My proposal would be:
[[
RFC 6906 defines the "profile" relation type for Link headers (RFC 8288). The profile relation allows source representations to indicate that they are following one or more profiles. The definition of a profile in [RFC 6906 §3](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6906#section-3) is very similar to the one used here and also uses URIs for profile identification. 
The use of a `Link: rel="profile" <URI>` header has a functions similar to the target attribute for the Link header suggested in [§7.1.1.2 of the conneg-by-ap doc](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#listprofilehttplink). The difference is that the use of `rel="profile"` links the source document directly to the profile(s) it follows (the target URI in the Link header is the URI of the profile), whereas the "profile" _attribute_ in a Link header specifies the profile of the source document itself (when using `rel="self"`) or an alternative representation of the source document (when using `rel="alternate"`).
]]

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/629#issuecomment-455607502 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 18 January 2019 16:34:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 March 2019 10:33:29 UTC