RE: Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD

Done: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/665


Andrea

----
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

From: PEREGO Andrea (JRC-ISPRA)
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 10:24 AM
To: Svensson, Lars; Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran
Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD

Hi, Lars.

Yes, it should be

https://publications.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/at-dataset/-/resource/dataset/access-right


I'll take care of updating accordingly the URLs all the MDR-* entries in config.js

Andrea

----
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

From: Svensson, Lars [mailto:L.Svensson@dnb.de]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:39 PM
To: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran
Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD

This looks good to me. Thanks for your great work!

One minor comment: The link to MDR-AR [1] in the bibliography [2] redirects to the general EU vocabulary page [3]. Navigating from there I can find the page for name authority list for access rights [3] that also lists a URI for that dataset [4]. Dereferencing that URI in the browser I get some garbled text that turns out to be a “300 Multiple Choices” response…

I don’t think that [1] is the best URI to link to since it doesn’t take the reader to the proper resource. Should we use [3] instead?

[1] http://publications.europa.eu/mdr/authority/access-right/

[2] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#bib-mdr-ar

[3] https://publications.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/at-dataset/-/resource/dataset/access-right

[4] http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/access-right


Best,

Lars

*** Lesen. Hören. Wissen. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek ***
--
Dr. Lars G. Svensson
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
Informationsinfrastruktur
Adickesallee 1
60322 Frankfurt am Main
Telefon: +49 69 1525-1752
Telefax: +49 69 1525-1799
mailto:l.svensson@dnb.de
http://www.dnb.de


From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran [mailto:alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 11:22 PM
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Request for feedback: Changes to Revised DCAT Editors' Draft since 2nd PWD


Dear All,

In the DCAT group call, we discussed that it would be great to start having the internal feedback on the latest additions to the DCAT Revision. In particular, the additions to the Editors' Draft [1] since the 2nd Public Working Draft [2], as enumerated below:

- a new section on 'Licenses and right statements' [3] was added to describe patterns for linking dcat:Datasets and dcat:Distributions to the relevant license and rights expressions.

- a new property dcat:hadRole [4] was added to support the use of prov:qualifiedAttribution to associate an agent with a DCAT resource, where the role of the agent with relation to the resource is specified, and is something other than the standard Dublin Core roles: creator, publisher or contributor - see Issue #79<https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/79>

- a new section on 'Attribution roles' [5] was added to recommend a pattern for assigning an agent to a catalogued resource with a qualified relationship.

- a new section on 'De-referenceable identifier' [6] was added to describe how to indicate different types of identifiers by using [DCTERMS<https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#bib-dcterms>] and [vocab-adms<https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#bib-vocab-adms>]

The difference between the two documents can be seen with the htmldiff tool [7].

Of course, feedback on any other aspect is also welcome.

Finally, please note that we have prioritised the issues that we will tackle next in two milestones ([8] and [9]). Please, let us know if you have any views on the set of issues we have selected and if you think we should include and/or remove other issues.

Many thanks,

Alejandra



[1] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat


[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/


[3] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#license-rights


[4] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#Property:hadRole


[5] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#qualified-attribution


[6] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#Dereferenceable-identifiers


[7] https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fvocab-dcat-2%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fdxwg%2Fdcat


[8] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/14


[9] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/15