W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] Data quality model [RDQM] (#58)

From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:12:27 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-453176297-1547140346-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I have just uploaded a new branch [ChangingConformanceExamplesToDWBP-riccardo ](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/dcat-issue58-ChangingConformanceExamplesToDWBP-riccardo) in which I turned the examples about the degree of conformance.

 I used the DWBP instead of INSPIRE.
 @andrea-perego Could you take a look?  It is a quick tweak as reading your previous comments I perceived that there was an urge of changing the examples. I hope the changes go in the right direction.  If you want to chime in changing things be my guest ;) 

The option of having examples with FAIR metrics is still open and is extremely interesting to me.  For the moment, I used the DWBP to avoid confusion and criticalities as I have noticed that the FAIR community is offering a technological layer (YAML using a smartAPI interface annotation)  for the metrics .... I suspect the presence of this layer might affect our examples with details that would be extremely interesting for a new paper but less for such a non-normative section in the DCAT ... @agbeltran  what do you think in this regard? 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/58#issuecomment-453176297 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2019 17:12:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 March 2019 10:33:28 UTC