- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:41:29 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair While I do like the approach to provide a 'simple' solution for 'simple' cases, I do feel a bit uneasy to replicate something that is already there, i.e. the more 'fundamental' solution in DQV. If we promote this 'simple' solution, 'simple' cases -- using the DCAT-specific solution -- are not going to be interoperable with more 'complex' cases using a DQV-based solution. One could argue that by promoting a DCAT-specific approach, we are discouraging people to use a DQV-based approach and thus only cater for 'simple' cases to be handled by DCAT. -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/84#issuecomment-465039725 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 08:41:31 UTC