- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 20:49:00 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
It may well be worth having two simpler diagrams to replace this - or to use shading to represent class not "meta-class". the use of a prof:hasResource from a dct:Standard is not incorrect: 1) a Standard is implicitly a profile of itself with a empty set of constraints ( in the same way Class C rdfs:subClassOf Class C ) 2) there is no other vocabulary to attach resources to Standards using a qualified association, PROF is deliberately design to be useful in this context. Its should not be necessary to explicitly declare something as a profile 3) from the perspective of describing a profile, it is important to describe what resources are associated with a base specification that said, i suspect that some focus on describing the "competency questions" of PROF might help, as it will be more obvious what it can do that cannot be done without it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/731#issuecomment-460797706 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20:49:02 UTC